Jump to content

Samuel Berger

Basic Member
  • Content Count

    1321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Samuel Berger last won the day on October 15 2018

Samuel Berger had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

62 Excellent

About Samuel Berger

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Occupation
    Cinematographer
  • Location
    Seattle
  • My Gear
    Eclair NPR, Fujica ZC-1000
  • Specialties
    Demented Forever

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Looks like Netflix allows the C200 in some cases. https://ymcinema.com/2019/04/18/canon-c200-is-netflix-approved-only-when-shooting-raw/
  2. I'm wondering about IBIS, does it have any? Never bothered to look.
  3. It's not, I'm trying to get $1400 for it because it cost me more than that and I sent it to Bernie for service, etc. So even if I magically got my asking price, I'll still be losing a lot of dough. But like you said, sunk cost is a fallacy.
  4. Yeah, it's pretty much useless for me, I'm never buying a PL mount camera again.
  5. Yes, that's how I used it with the Ursa Mini and Arri 2C. I also had the lens serviced by Bernie O'Dougherty.
  6. But it is PL with the adapter. That footage I shot with my Ursa Mini PL was shot with it. Works perfectly.
  7. Like the title says, Should I sell my Angenieux 25-250 by itself or with my Eclair NPR kit? I think it would add value to the kit, but I also know that I could probably sell it faster by itself. I have an Eclair NPR Ultra 16mm package that I need to sell as soon as possible. It was easy to sell the Ursa Mini 4K but this will be a harder sell. The zoom is actually for 35mm cameras, has an Arri B mount, I used it on the Arri 2C and the Ursa Mini with its PL adapter. So I could see folks being interested in buying it by itself. Just wondering what anyone thinks.
  8. I think it's not necessarily cheaper to film digitally because there are so many variables involved. You have to know what project and what budget and you have to have good business sense, which I think a lot of artists seem to lack. When you say "shoot digitally" you could be talking about shooting with a smartphone or an Arri Alexa. When you say shoot film you could be talking about using a Kodak Instamatic Super-8 or Panavision cameras. Right now I think you just need to use what you need to get the product done. My biggest regret was investing in film gear for a project that could have been done on a first-gen BMPCC. The film didn't get done and now it never will be. For my next one I'll start planning on shooting digitally from the beginning, using my Canon EOS R. If I ever make any money then I can move back to L.A. and shoot film all I want, but since they closed down Alpha Cine here in Seattle, it's just not realistic to work blindly with film.
  9. Sharp came out with an 8K instead. Experimental, however.
  10. Welcome to the forum, I've been to Bulawayo but it's been a very long time. We didn't go west very often, we mostly used to take the train from Salisbury to Umtali and then on to Beira for vacations. Wonderful times, now long gone! It's great to see someone producing film over there! 🙂 I'm really happy to hear from you! What are you shooting with?
  11. Sold. I kinda wish it hadn't, but.... Macks Fiiod had a few interesting thoughts on "sunk cost fallacy". 😉 @Max Field / Macks Fiiod
  12. MUST SELL THIS WEEKEND! PRICE LOWERED TO $1200!
  13. Now on my sister's eBay store: https://www.ebay.com/itm/223473085578
  14. (This sale is for the camera body only, no lenses or accessories.) image hosting
×
×
  • Create New...