Emanuel A Guedes

Price should be around $500. A bargain, almost free for what it is.

I agree with both. As far as that sample concerns (a poor example I know), I don't see any aliasing though.

http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d3100/features01.htm http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2010/0819_d3100_01.htm Footage sample available: http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/microsite/d-movie/en/background/index.htm H.264/MPEG-4 23.1 x 15.4 mm CMOS sensor (DX-format) for 14.8 million pixels AF-area modes for live view and movies - four AF-area modes depending on the subject: normal-area AF, wide-area AF, face-priority AF, and subject-tracking AF. http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d3100/features03.htm#f04 They say there are more 4 lenses to come with the camera release, among them a Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.4 G with Nano coating; 10 lens elements in 9 groups.

Try to click in, sorry, on that "Play" button inside the black rectangle, you'll see it will work by your means. Almost as simple as pressing the red button ;-) Hope it helps!

Yes Keith, you've been my english teacher of my online english course. Mine and of both of my two blonde and brunette secretaries to whom I'm used to dictate my replies to you (what type do you like most? Be gentle on the answer 'cause they both fell in love :lol: and nobody wants fights over here). We have more people attending our courses out there, plus instructors and so on, and some people need silence to work. Oh sorry, I forgot it is prime time in New South Wales. Next time, we'll think to add a program in australian english and culture (who knows it helps the number of attendees grow faster?). About your showreel request, send to us how much are you thinking to help us with our funding stuff (you know, some people need RED cameras or whatever cameras you want, for living, not only for pressing the record button and they cost money) and then we talk.

Is it a question or a statement both in disguise? 'cause if it is, I thought that many «über-variable English skills» you like to do mention in your words, they could explain a lot of "things". Yes, I was the only one over here from day one, when it was me who brought others, even before the usual guys you like to harass with. EDIT -- JFYI, in the recent RED DAY in Rome with Ted Shilowitz, 5% of people arrived with me, real people not any alias behind a keyboard somewhere in the planet Earth. The meeting occurred in Casa del Cinema's auditorium and was full of people, big one you know. But maybe 'cause RED doesn't exist, this had just been one of those nightmares of yours, a bad and real one. ;)

I hope you are in Genova for leisure but if it is for work and need anything, let me know. I have a good friend there. E. :-)

Stephen, Stop this. You know you've been one of the most valuable contributors @ reduser.net. As matter of fact, it would be helpful to read more posts from you over there, so don't feed this nonsense please? Greetings from Rome, E. :-)

No, the naysayers didn't start to flame there. But three years earlier under the Jim Murdoch period, when I was the only one here holding the RED flag, well before having others to jump with me to the RED boat aka filmmaker's gang joke. I'm sorry, I forgot you opened your current account later. ;)

Well, as Aristotle said, «the whole is more than the sum of its parts» ;-)

Otis has spent his last three years of his life to research and develop his full HD uncompressed camera. Photos released today: http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?p=2071409&posted=1#post2071409 Sample extracted from the prototype It seems we need a new sub-forum one of these days humm, Stephen? ;)

In these times when it is so easy to find the same shots wherever you go, here is a non-useless exercise as food for thought: EDIT -- OK, in this case, they are two but it is the second one that counts...

The first image that appears is the old BD - roll your cursor over it to see the same shot on the new BD from a 4K transfer.

Here is a BD example from a similar film source with the introduction of a 4K transfer in-between for the new Gladiator's BD version now available in Europe: [6 samples] http://comparescreenshots.slicx.com/comparison/68257/picture:0 Any doubts?

Yours and Jim's (btw, we all know he's reading these lines) point. Whether we like whether not, we cannot say Jim has no a successful business strategy. They're posts like yours that makes industry goes ahead. Digital included. All that digital vs. film stuff is just net plein/plenty rubbish.

:lol: On that, you're fully right.

LOL An old colleague of film school had linked it to my FB account today. From a former teacher of both there. Thanks for your post anyway. And for your link. Nice to read the others' input. Cheers, E. :-)

«Some of the earliest color motion pictures that you will ever see...»

To disregard Canon would actually be a full mistake, IMHO too. I think it has been a full surprise even for Canon. That's why they're still in the h.264 side, despite the power they have. Apart the usual talk about the pros and cons as far as big screen concerns, without mention for online purposes (an important market to not neglect), I am in touch with people working for TV practically in a daily basis where the 5D Mark II has surpassed the most conservative expectations indeed.

Yes, Jim has been very cautelous with dates right now. Does this mean anything? ;) You need to go down along the thread in order to find where it is explicit the release date. A few would call it viral marketing, the believers will say 2010.

Interesting http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=47139

Take a look on this MJPEG here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/movies/16hellman.html?ref=movies «... the entire film was shot on what is essentially a still camera (the Canon 5D Mark II), while looking like a mega-million Hollywood production. (“Road” cost “under five million,” Mr. Gaydos said.) “The great thing about this camera is you don’t need permits because no one knows you’re shooting,” said Mr. Hellman, who as a 10-year-old made his first photographic enlarger out of a soup can and a cigar box. “It has the capability of shooting high-def movies. On a little flash card. You can shoot 12 minutes at a time. Which is still more than you could shoot on 35 millimeter; a 35 millimeter reel is 10 minutes. It’s fantastic. And it looks like a still camera.” He said another film at Cannes was shot with the same kind of camera, “but they started shooting in December, and we started in July, so I guess we’re the first.”»

PS Oh, I am sorry. I forgot a few doesn't even consider a prosumer camera to be called a cinema camera. Or... a digital camcorder, my apologies. ;) (in your native language) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel Now I got where you're getting your usual misspelled double 'm's :lol:

US $6000 for a digital cinema camera with a large sensor size is a milestone indeed. Release date: December 2010 http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t...574&page=13 http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/store...082010101919040