Bayley Sweitzer

Here is a test roll I shot of the Vision 2 50D: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoo4-Q4MNAU. I've heard a lot of people say the same thing, but when transfered, I think it looked GREAT! I think it might have been designed to be transfered, not projected, but lemme know what you think.

I actually just posted some tests of their 250 D here: http://www.cinematography.com/index.php?showtopic=53650

Just thought I'd share what the new Vivid 250D looks like so you don't have to spend a hundred bucks to find out. Make sure you watch it on YouTube at 1080 HD to get the full effect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaNYmcYAlwM It was surprisingly grainy, especially in bright light.

I just shot some tests of the Fuji ETERNA Vivid 250D for an upcoming project of mine. I don't know if I'll end up using it, but I thought I'd share, just to give you a sense of what it looks like. (recommend watching it on YouTube so you can make it full HD) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaNYmcYAlwM I was actually surprised by how grainy it was. Also the colors weren't as "vivid" as they advertised, but I guess that's just 250D in bright sun.