Jump to content

panagiotis agapitou

Basic Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    125

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by panagiotis agapitou

  1. panagiotis agapitou
    Hello Has anyone use ARRI Variable primes on Alexa mini ? I'm afraid of porthole 'cause the SONNAR design (The 1.78 frame will have 20.96mm width as the standard 35mm film frame) Thank you very much !!
  2. panagiotis agapitou
    Nobody ??
  3. panagiotis agapitou
    It's eyes wide shut https://ibb.co/mEmsvq https://ibb.co/d1hXvq the dark knight rises script
  4. panagiotis agapitou
    Hello I have found these infos on a Daily Continuity report : Set Up: 18mm ShInf-50' T1.4 Lens Ht: N/K Is a night exterior crane shot showing a car on city street .. it's on 35mm film and the lens probably a Zeiss super speed mkii I guess it has to do with the 'focus on infinity' ? Also what does the 'N/K' mean ?? Thanks !!!
  5. panagiotis agapitou
    Thanks you very much !! You are right !! I looked very carefull the shot .. and the dark side of the filter is on the bortom of the frame
  6. panagiotis agapitou
    Hi I have these indormations from a Daily Continuity Report (i have not seen the actual document .. the infos were transfered to me) .. It's a 35mm FILM with zeiss super speeds mkii Set Up: 18 mm 6'-15' T1.4.8/10 LC1 ND.3HEGrad Btm 1. I guess the T infos are on a something like ''minolta scale'' ?? 2. What is the Btm ?? Thanks !!
  7. panagiotis agapitou
    You are right !!! In Vivian's making of the Shining .. Before going to shoot a maze scene .. Stanley ask to be available the 9.8mm the 14.5mm and the 18mm !! If he used also and a 12mm why not ask to be and this available ... ;) I have another question ... Garett brown said that the most of the film was shot with the Cooke 18mm In the Shining Kubrick did a hard use of the Zeiss B Speeds set Have any thoughts why he preffered the Cooke 18mm instead of the Zeiss T1.4 18mm ? Thanks again !!
  8. panagiotis agapitou
    We are not talking anymore for the photograph .. check last posts i saw it here : https://indiefilmhustle.com/laowa-12mm-venus-optics/ and here : https://www.reddit.com/r/cinematography/comments/30ulmj/kubricks_lenses_a_complete_guide_to_the_lenses/cpwoi85/
  9. panagiotis agapitou
    May he used a still converted lens ..
  10. panagiotis agapitou
    I think you are right .. it's more likely a cooke 18mm !! But i have read that on Clockwork Orange used a lot of 12mm lens .. any thoughts about what kind of 12mm was that ?? Btw the ARRI 12MM i posted .. when was released ?? Thanks again !!
  11. panagiotis agapitou
    Is this the ARRI 12mm 2.1 ?? (made by the zeiss standard prime 16mm) jibanananda das kobita in bengali adventures of isabel iron man 2 movie
  12. panagiotis agapitou
    I mean I will shot spherical on the 6:5 Anamorphic ARRIROW mode ... to be closest to the Standard 35mm format (20.96mm) Just as David Mullen recomended me on that topic
  13. panagiotis agapitou
    I'm trying to understand WHAT is this effect ... And WHEN it happens ... Optically looks like viggneting .. right ? I know it's caused by the small exit pupil's diameter that disorients the light rays .. And the digital sensors are not flat as the film surrface to capture them Right ?
  14. panagiotis agapitou
    I've read some articles about the 16mm and 24mm but i'm conffused about this effect... Some says it happens only if you shoot a monochrome wall ... I'm going to use them on Alexa mini with the frame (1.78) cropped to 35mm film width (20.96mm) It's all night shots and most of them outdoors (roads, cars etc) and stopping down the lenses may be underexpossed What you think about ?? Thanks !!!
  15. panagiotis agapitou
    what lens is that ??
  16. panagiotis agapitou
    Please take a look at this thread .... : http://www.cinematography.com/index.php?showtopic=76505 May that be a very very early version of the standard primes 2.1 and tha'ts becouse the 24mm distagon was vignetting ???
  17. panagiotis agapitou
    That's right Dave !! Leon Vitali had supervised all Kubrick films restorations (always in collaboration with Kubrick as he was alive) from the VHS time till the Blu-ray's ... And not only restorations but any kind of TV releases, Translations etc ... He was also supervising the 5.1 SOUND remix for Blu-ray's He was the Authorised (By kubrick himself) supervisor of his material ... And suddenly Nolan come up 19 years after Kubrick's death and presents an unrestored version as "The movie as Kubrick wanted you to see"
  18. panagiotis agapitou
    I don't know either .. but they gave full support to Nolan at Cannes etc ...
  19. panagiotis agapitou
    Also the Kubrick family blames too for the permision they gave
  20. panagiotis agapitou
    I belive that all that "Nolan" involment is just a commercial trick of the Studio to take advantage of the name of a modern director for the re-release and make some buz around it ... The only guy that should make restorations is Leon Vitali ... period ...
  21. panagiotis agapitou
    go to youtube comments ... they got some very interesting post : pinguposer : If the Nolan version is from "new print elements taken from original negative", who did the colour timing, and what were they referring to to ensure they matched the director's wishes? darwinia55 : Yes! After film is exposed it has to be color corrected. Just because you're presenting an uncorrected negative of the film doesn't mean you're showing the director's vision. And there's no way that Kubrick would have allowed this green monster to be presented to the public. TheStockwell : Thank you for doing this! When I saw the "unrestored" trailer, I wondered who the Hell thought the film looked better in turquoise and teal. I owned the Criterion edition of the film which was supervised by Kubrick. It wasn't color graded into blue green with weak contrast, dingy, and with virtually no blacks or whites. A Motion Selfie : Stanley Kubrick supervised a remastering of 2001 in the '90s. The current 70mm prints that have been in circulation for nearly 20 years do not look like the Nolan print. Ive seen them projected maybe 4-5 times. The Nolan version looks like a print made from faded 50-year old materials. I do not believe that's what Kubrick would've wanted people to see. He would've wanted a version remastered using the latest technology -- in fact, it was remastered in 4k for a new video release later this year. It's not "digital trickery," it's not the Star Wars special editions -- it's the same process used to restore all older movies. TheStockwell : It was a long time ago, in 1993 - remember laserdiscs? The Criterion release was for the 25th anniversary of the film. The film was split into 30-minutes sides. Great bonus features, though - everything from hundredsof production stills, Arthur C. Clarke reading "The Sentinel," to the text of the 20-minutes of interviews that was to be the film's introduction. Since Kubrick supervised the colour matching and transfer for the Criterion release - and wrote a few lines saying it was authorised by him - all Nolan really has to do is use it as a reference. onthe trail : Ermmm why does this "As Kubrick intended it" colour timing look like Nolan's Interstellar?
  22. panagiotis agapitou
    go people ...
  23. panagiotis agapitou
    Thank you very much guys for your answers :)
  24. panagiotis agapitou
    That's the answer
  25. panagiotis agapitou
    I want the highest quality despite the mess :) no pain no gain .. right ?? ;)
×
×
  • Create New...