sattch Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Anyone ever tried removing the shutter from their k-3's? Aside from being blind, I can't think of anything.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olex Kalynychenko Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Anyone ever tried removing the shutter from their k-3's? Aside from being blind, I can't think of anything.... Yes, This is possible, you need unscrew a few screws only. But, you need cine camera without shutter disk ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Matthew W. Phillips Posted October 5, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted October 5, 2006 I would guess without a shutter you wouldnt have any clear division between frames and you might have serious blurring. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacob thomas Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 I would guess without a shutter you wouldnt have any clear division between frames and you might have serious blurring. Just a thought. I would guess that that is the point of removing the shutter. Blurring, streaking and perhaps also other unpredictable effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Matthew W. Phillips Posted October 6, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted October 6, 2006 I would guess that that is the point of removing the shutter. Blurring, streaking and perhaps also other unpredictable effects. Fair enough, but what is the intended project that would cause someone to want to film in this manner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Jonathan Benny Posted October 6, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted October 6, 2006 Fair enough, but what is the intended project that would cause someone to want to film in this manner? Presumably anything of an experimental nature. AJB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Collier Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 I have heard of shifting the phase of the shutter so you get some streaking, but with no shutter you may get more streaks than you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Nathan Milford Posted October 6, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted October 6, 2006 With no shutter you will get a continuous smear of exposure. A phase shifted (or mis-timed) shutter will streak the image, but you will still have an definte image, the degree of which depends on how much you phase the shutter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacob thomas Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 With no shutter you will get a continuous smear of exposure. A phase shifted (or mis-timed) shutter will streak the image, but you will still have an definte image, the degree of which depends on how much you phase the shutter. This hasn't been the effect I've seen on others shutterless cameras. The smear is mostly on the highlights. Because the film movement is intermittent and not continuous each frame gets most of its exposure while still and only a small amount in motion producing the streaks. The amount of smear is then dependent on the lighting of the scene. Do a search over on the filmshooting.com forum for examples made on super 8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now