p2 can catch up with F900?

[YongLee]

HI everybody,

someone said the image shooted by Panasonic P2 can catch up with sony F900, is ture?

if not ,then P2 can get 2K? or 4K? thanks!

[Mike Brennan]

HI everybody,

someone said the image shooted by Panasonic P2 can catch up with sony F900, is ture?

if not ,then P2 can get 2K? or 4K? thanks!

 

 

The latest camera from Panasonic the 3000 uses P2 to store AVC Intra 100 codec.

In general the 3000 surpasses f900 by having

14bit AD

10bit 4:2:2 recording of all 1920x1080 pixels

 

However AVC Intra artefacts are yet to be fully explored but at first glance looks like a better balance of useable data vs compression than HDCAM.

 

 

 

 

Mike Brennan

[Brian Drysdale]

HI everybody,

someone said the image shooted by Panasonic P2 can catch up with sony F900, is ture?

if not ,then P2 can get 2K? or 4K? thanks!

 

You're looking at different things. P2 is a recording medium and the F900 is a camcorder which records HDCAM onto tape.

 

If Panasonic wants to bring out a camera which has sensors that have the same number of pixels or more than those found on the F900 and uses a codec which is equal to or better than HDCAM there's no reason why they couldn't record onto P2 cards. So, judging only by the specs, the new Panasonic AJ-HPX3000 looks to be better in a number of respects to the F900.

 

Other cameras (including RED) record onto solid state memory cards.

[YongLee]

thanks, then , AG-HVX200 can catch up with SONY F900?

[Stephen Williams]

thanks, then , AG-HVX200 can catch up with SONY F900?

 

Hi,

 

Are you joking!

 

Stephen

[Brian Drysdale]

thanks, then , AG-HVX200 can catch up with SONY F900?

 

No, you'll have to buy a AJ-HPX3000.