wallspray Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 Im shooting a short on 16mm. its a dinner scene and i want the entire room too look as though it were lit only by candles... any suggestions as to how to go about this and still get an exposure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Michael Nash Posted December 2, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 2, 2004 Check the archives as this has been discussed many, many times. You'll have to supplement the practical candle light with off-camera movie lights. There are various tricks to making the artificial light look like it's motivated from the candles. Basically you want the light to come from the same direction, but avoid casting a shadow of the candle on the subject. You'll also want to keep the light from spilling on the back wall too much and over-illuminating the room (natural candle light falls off pretty quickly). Try gelling the lights with some CTO; maybe 1/2. It just depends how warm you want the scene to look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zrszach Posted December 2, 2004 Share Posted December 2, 2004 (edited) take a look at this. http://www.theasc.com/clubhouse/tricks/tip-cc1.htm Edited December 2, 2004 by zrszach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Chris Keth Posted December 3, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 3, 2004 take a look at this.http://www.theasc.com/clubhouse/tricks/tip-cc1.htm <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wow, could be some work convincing a director of the makeup thing the first time out. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Downes Posted December 3, 2004 Share Posted December 3, 2004 If you have the money, get a superfast lens, like a Zeiss 0.7 or a Leica 0.9 and shoot with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Daniel J. Ashley-Smith Posted December 4, 2004 Share Posted December 4, 2004 (edited) If you have the money, get a superfast lens, like a Zeiss 0.7 or a Leica 0.9 and shoot with that. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't get this whole thing with super fast lenses. Sure, a Zeiss 0.7 is DAMN fast, but look at what DOF you will get. I doubt you could even keep the entire actor in focus. (Oops, yeh I meant DOF) Edited December 5, 2004 by Daniel J. Ashley-Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted December 5, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 5, 2004 You mean DOF (Depth of Field) nor DOP (Director of Photography) although what DOP you get DOES matter too! And you're right, the focus is incredibly shallow. I'm not even sure one can get a T/0.7 Zeiss lens -- that was something special made by Zeiss for NASA that Kubrick bought and had adapted for a non-reflex Mitchell. Anyway, a normal T/1.4 Zeiss Super Speed and filmstock pushed to 800 ASA would be the equivalent of what Kubrick was working with on "Barry Lyndon" (T/0.7, 100 ASA film pushed to 200 ASA.) But Kubrick used special-made triple-wicked candles for three times the light output. The general approach is to use fast film and fast lenses, not enough usually to ONLY shoot by candlelight but enough so that they expose realistically bright enough and add some exposure -- augmented by very low-level artificial light (low in order to not overpower the candles). For example, "Amadeus" used Chinese Lanterns with orange-painted light bulbs in them to augment the real candlelight (and I think they used double-wicked candles.) The fastest cine lens I've seen for rent is a 50mm T/1.1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidSloan Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 I've never worked with these trick movie candles...does anyone have a link for them? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Chris Keth Posted December 6, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 6, 2004 I don't get this whole thing with super fast lenses. Sure, a Zeiss 0.7 is DAMN fast, but look at what DOF you will get. I doubt you could even keep the entire actor in focus. (Oops, yeh I meant DOF) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> How exactly can you possibly have a .7 lens? Isn't a 1.0 lens theoretically the fastest lens possible since it would allow all available light through with no loss? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Pytlak RIP Posted December 6, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 6, 2004 Extra bright candles: http://www.thecandlefactory.com/custom.php They range from jumbo hand-dipped tapers, to extra bright burning candles for the movies (including Alamo and Spy Kids), and even a special wax target for The University of Texas at Austin. Most custom candle shops can do the same. At 24fps (170 degree shutter) and f/2.0, an EI 500 film requires only 10 footcandles for FULL NORMAL exposure. In most cases, a candlelit "look" is underexposed somewhat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Erik Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 an EI 500 film requires only 10 footcandles for FULL NORMAL exposure. In most cases, a candlelit "look" is underexposed somewhat. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> John - Does that mean that EI250 can get full normal exposure with 20 regular candles? (what is a footcandle vs. a store-bought single wick candle?) thanks EH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Pytlak RIP Posted December 6, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 6, 2004 Yes, an EI250 film would require twice the light of an EI500 film, all else being equal. A "footcandle" is a standardized measure of illumination. In effect it is the light falling on a surface 1 foot away from a "standard" candle, whatever that once was. Obviously candles vary in light output, depending on the wick type and length, and the fuel (type of wax). Here are links to information about light measurement: http://www.intl-light.com/handbook/registered.html http://www.led.net/pages/tech4.htm http://www.science.edu.sg/ssc/detailed.jsp...parent=5&cat=56 http://encarta.msn.com/text_761579230___28/Light.html http://www.photo.net/photo/edscott/pss00020.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Erik Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 very cool, thanks John! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now