Premium Member Matthew W. Phillips Posted October 5, 2009 Premium Member Share Posted October 5, 2009 Planning a shoot without filtering because "Oh, I´ll just have it corrected in post..." is just plain wrong. If someone forgets to use a filter, well then that is what you have to work with, just make the best out of the situation. But don´t plan for "adding a 85 in post", use the 85 filter in your cameras people. Kent, David has done some extraordinary work so I don't think I would insult him. I argued with him in the past about things until I saw his reel and I was blown away...he backs up his talk. I don't think anyone is saying to deliberately not use a Wratten 85 outside. We're just saying that if you miake a mistake (they happen), you don't generally have to reshoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Kumpula Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 (edited) Kent, David has done some extraordinary work so I don't think I would insult him. Not sure if there has been a misunderstanding in some of my posts... I never meant to insult anyone. I don't think anyone is saying to deliberately not use a Wratten 85 outside. Actually that is exactly what David Rakoczy did... in this post: Sofia... you do not need to use an 85 when shooting Tungsten balanced Film in Daylight. You can add the 85 in Post. I don´t agree with the above post that is telling people to deliberately skip the filtering. I then felt that this statement was somewhat "backep up" by Justin who wrote that it wasn´t that difficult to colorcorrect for incorrect filtering. We're just saying that if you miake a mistake (they happen), you don't generally have to reshoot. Agreed. Edited October 5, 2009 by Kent Kumpula Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kevin Thomas Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 Hello, I recently purchased a canon 814 autozoom super 8. As far as i can tell it appears to be in great condition, but my color film came back looking muddy --- the colors are dark, the highlights are very bright with an orange tint (a lot of contrast, but little detail.) Flesh tones also appear very orange or red. I was shooting in bright sunshine using Ektachrome 64T Color Reversal with no filter on the camera. When shooting in B&W using 7265 PXR464 Super 8 50' Eastman Plus-X Reversal film in the same conditions the quality seems fine (maybe a little dark, but fine otherwise. Is there any reason why my camera would be fine shooting black & white film, but not with the color? If anyone has advice or knows what I'm doing wrong I would really appreciate your suggestions. Thanks so much! SM I have had another think about my flare theory and I have to admit I'm not so sure it holds up. My first step would be to check the camera's metering, a far more likely explanation for the under exposure even if the B & W seemed fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Jensen Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 I don't think anyone is saying to deliberately not use a Wratten 85 outside. We're just saying that if you miake a mistake (they happen), you don't generally have to reshoot. I have deliberately not used an 85 at the end of the day to gain stop when the light is going. But, you're right, that is something I didn't plan to do, I simply had no choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Lovell Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 I don´t remember anyone saying it was difficult... I just said it won´t look as good as it would look if the cameraman would have used a 85 filter in the camera. Sofia... you do not need to use an 85 when shooting Tungsten balanced Film in Daylight. You can add the 85 in Post. Quote- KENT KUMPULA I don´t agree with the above post that is telling people to deliberately skip the filtering. I then felt that this statement was somewhat "backep up" by Justin who wrote that it wasn´t that difficult to colorcorrect for incorrect filtering. - I never said to skip the filtering. I said that you can color correct the footage depending on the color temperature. Careful where you point fingers kent. You may wish to re-read what people write before you comment. I wasn't backing up that statement. I don't really care, but you may run across someone who will take offence to being misrepresented by your comments. Planning a shoot without filtering because "Oh, I´ll just have it corrected in post..." is just plain wrong. If someone forgets to use a filter, well then that is what you have to work with, just make the best out of the situation. But don´t plan for "adding a 85 in post", use the 85 filter in your cameras people. agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kent Kumpula Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 - I never said to skip the filtering. And I never said that you said that people should skip the filtering? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now