Reuel Gomez Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 In a hypothetical set of a 40mm, 50mm, 60mm, 75mm, and 100mm, what would be the difference in cost between the Panavision C- and G-Series anamorphic primes? I would assume the G-Series would be more expensive due to them being more recent, but then again, aren't the C-Series rented out more often? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Drysdale Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) Hard to tell, since there has been inflation and no one outside Panavision knows how much it cost to develop and manufacture both batches of lenses. I'd assume the G cost more because of higher correction etc. but they didn't have computers to assist on the C series. Edited August 14, 2013 by Brian Drysdale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reuel Gomez Posted August 14, 2013 Author Share Posted August 14, 2013 Hard to tell, since there has been inflation and no one outside Panavision knows how much it cost to develop and manufacture both batches of lenses. I'd assume the G cost more because of higher correction etc. but they didn't have computers to assist on the C series. Wow, I really need to start elaborating and stop being so vague. I was actually referring to the cost of renting them. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted August 14, 2013 Premium Member Share Posted August 14, 2013 G-series would cost more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now