Michael Carter Posted August 25, 2018 Share Posted August 25, 2018 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=g1js_Ii-jfs There is a formula in the 150 lab book to boost Tri-X to 2500. I wonder if it will work on Double-X? Indoors had only 20 foot candles but f4 worked at 24 fps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Burke Posted August 26, 2018 Share Posted August 26, 2018 If that is all at ƒ4, then you are on to something. Do you plan to have it scanned? That way you could see the grain and sharpness. How did it look projected? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Carter Posted August 26, 2018 Author Share Posted August 26, 2018 (edited) A video of it projected was made. It looked gray. I like more contrast, like the lighter shot of my son, but it was too light. 1/3 stop overexposure may do the trick, longer developing could be tried. Or printing could be tweaked. But, I'm happy to get f4 with greater depth of focus. At least I'm in the ball park. Scanning is too expensive, more film is better. Edited August 26, 2018 by Michael Carter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Carter Posted August 28, 2018 Author Share Posted August 28, 2018 Another test made 6400 Asa last night. I can see grain with my naked eye in a magnifying glass. But I can print these negatives. Details in my blog... https://www.facebook.com/michael.studiocarter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Carter Posted August 29, 2018 Author Share Posted August 29, 2018 Oh yea, 6400 Asa is it. The latest print from the neg developed last night looks great. Will post in blog after dry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now