Alain LeTourneau Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 Went to see 2046 the other night at the independently run Cinema 21 here in Portland, Oregon. Projectionist did a wonderful job. Nice scope print, hardly any noticable wear. A real treat to look at. Shot on Fuji stocks (I don't know which numbers) and I believe printed on Fuji at Eclair. Highly recommend catching it if you can. New issue of Cineaste covers Wong-Kar Wai's career. --Alain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Nathan Milford Posted September 9, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted September 9, 2005 Projectionist did a wonderful job. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I love that you can actually compliment a projectionist. Few people know the things that the mysterious man in the booth can do to make your experience more pleasurable. I saw it at Sunshine Cinema in Houston St. here in NY. They did a good job as well, I very much enjoyed the film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted September 9, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted September 9, 2005 Hi, The converse of this is that if it's a really rough print, there's often not a lot the projectionist can do about it. About a year ago, I projected an original, 1980s print of "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom". It broke three times and was generally in abysmal condition but what're you gonna do... once it's rolling it's a zero intervention process other than occasional focus checks. Phil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Wells Posted September 9, 2005 Share Posted September 9, 2005 I liked it quite a bit, I'm charitable towards WKW. But I did think the DI was barely adequate. (It looked pretty cool anyway) -Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Vialet Posted September 13, 2005 Share Posted September 13, 2005 If i remember correctly, the Fuji stock they shot with was the Super F250T 8552... I loved the film by the way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Adam Frisch FSF Posted September 13, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted September 13, 2005 I almost screamed at the screen - cut to a wiiiiiiiiide, for Christ's sake!!! One of the most annoying films ever made visually - 100% close-ups. I don't care how well they're lit - close-ups are easy. If you want to show me what you're made of as a DP, then do it on wides. The DI was also horrendous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Charlie Seper Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 (edited) I almost screamed at the screen - cut to a wiiiiiiiiide, for Christ's sake!!! One of the most annoying films ever made visually - 100% close-ups. I don't care how well they're lit - close-ups are easy. If you want to show me what you're made of as a DP, then do it on wides. I can't comment on this film but I agree with your last sentence. Have you seen a German film just out on DVD in the states called, "Schultze Gets The Blues"? There's hardly a close-up to be found in it. And no quick cuts whatsoever. Almost every single shot lasts for no less than 20-seconds and some for a full minute. A few may have been held a little too long but overall it was a pleasure to look at. Absolutely beautiful cinematography work too. And the music used throughout is quite different. Everything about this film is unusual compared to what's out today. Its like a combination of old-time dramatic film making and documentary techniques. Actually, the story was only so so, but it was incredibly well shot. Edited September 16, 2005 by Charlie Seper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Budden Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 I almost screamed at the screen - cut to a wiiiiiiiiide, for Christ's sake!!! One of the most annoying films ever made visually - 100% close-ups. I don't care how well they're lit - close-ups are easy. If you want to show me what you're made of as a DP, then do it on wides. The DI was also horrendous. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I thought it rather brilliantly emphasized the claustrophobia of hong kong. Wide angle shots are the standard nowadays and I tend to appreciate artists doing away with the standard. The framing in 2046 had other interesting psychological effects as well... It somehow complimented the obsessive nature of most of the characters. Steven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Wells Posted September 16, 2005 Share Posted September 16, 2005 I thought it rather brilliantly emphasized the claustrophobia of hong kong. Wide angle shots are the standard nowadays and I tend to appreciate artists doing away with the standard. The framing in 2046 had other interesting psychological effects as well... It somehow complimented the obsessive nature of most of the characters. Steven <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Agree 100 % Really it's not so new with WKW, "In The Mood For Love" hardly goes wider and in "Days Of Being Wild" it's really the close stuff in which Chris Doyle's distinct style first stands out.. Besides who doesn't want to be close to Carina Lau, Faye Wong, Maggie Cheung, Zhang Ziyi and Gong Li ? -Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph White Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 saw 2046 a little while back - really loved it, as i've loved pretty much all wkw offerings. interesting to see his first anamorphic feature - great article in the new AC about it - and how difficult it was to get a hold of panavision anamorphic lenses in asia as they were a low budget show and they shot over the course of several years with multiple dop's. haha can't imagine being their rep at panavision and getting a request for a full set of c's or e's for "i don't, know, a few months, couple of years, whatever, cool?" they did in fact shoot fuji 250t - a fave of doyle and all involved. the DI really shines in the future sequences, and the fx, though not skywalker-esque, are gorgeous and very apporpriate, i think. still not my favorite - happy together and chungking express still stand out to me more than anything, great movies and i saw them at some great times in my life with wonderful people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Max Jacoby Posted September 25, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted September 25, 2005 the DI really shines in the future sequences That is not the film I saw. As pointed out here by others the DI is really bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Jason Debus Posted September 25, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted September 25, 2005 I almost screamed at the screen - cut to a wiiiiiiiiide, for Christ's sake!!! One of the most annoying films ever made visually - 100% close-ups. I don't care how well they're lit - close-ups are easy. If you want to show me what you're made of as a DP, then do it on wides. The DI was also horrendous. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The latest American Cinematographer magazine (Sept 2005) had a short write up on 2046, apparently the lack of quality of the wide lenses dictated their compositions. I scanned the pages if anyone is interested. I thought the images looked outstanding at the theatre I was at. Some of the graniness on gradients and such I took as film grain and not digital noise, but my eyes are not as trained as some of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now