Jump to content
Edward Goldner

which 16mm stock would be suitable to achieve this look?

Recommended Posts

hello all,

 

i've attached a reference photo that we're using for an upcoming project that i'm shooting. just wondering which 16mm stock people would recommend to achieve a similar style (colour, constrast & texture) to the attached image.

 

the film will consist of an interior bedroom scene, which will be lit with daylight-balanced lamps and exteriors, which will most probably be shot around magic hour and will ideally have a warmer, golden feel to them. thanks very much for your time!

 

regards,

edward goldner

post-29107-1235907757.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have gotten similar results using Fuji 8683 400T (rated 200) under fluorescents and tungsten lights and tweaked in post. Your sample picture has no grain though. Film will have more grain. Definitely send the sample pic to the telecine lab for reference!

Edited by Saul Rodgar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the final project be color-corrected digitally or photochemically?

 

Because one aspect that is distinct about the photo is that the blacks are fogged magenta/red.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi david,

 

we will be colour correcting digitally, it is unlikely that we will be able to afford to any elaborate processing.

 

ed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest John Lasher
explain what you mean by 'rated 200'

 

He means you're going to intentionally overexpose the film. Set your light meter to 200 ASA (even though the film stock is 400 ASA).

 

When you send that roll for processing, be sure to tell the lab what you did, they will under-develop the roll to compensate. (I believe this is pulling one stop, someone correct me if I'm wrong.) While this seems elaborate, the lab I use doesn't charge anything extra for it.

 

What this will do, among other things, is reduce the appearance of grain, getting you closer to the very clean look of the sample image. This is a rare case of 2 wrongs making a right.

 

(Conversely if you wanted a grainier-than-normal image, you could rate the film at 800, and have the lab push, or overdevelop it.)

 

As others have said, definitely send your sample image to the lab.

Edited by John Lasher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, shooting 400t rated at 200t is just to expose some of the finer grains which inturn diminishes grain perception. You don't have the lab do anything. You just correct this overexposure with printer lights or in telecine. Pull Processing will actually increase grain perception.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, shooting 400t rated at 200t is just to expose some of the finer grains which inturn diminishes grain perception. You don't have the lab do anything. You just correct this overexposure with printer lights or in telecine. Pull Processing will actually increase grain perception.

 

Indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS



    Serious Gear



    Abel Cine



    FJS International



    Metropolis Post



    Broadcast Solutions Inc



    Ritter Battery



    Rig Wheels Passport



    Glidecam



    Wooden Camera



    New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment



    Tai Audio



    Just Cinema Gear



    CineLab



    Visual Products



    The Original Slider



    G-Force Grips



    Paralinx LLC



    Gamma Ray Digital Inc


    Cinematography Books and Gear
×
×
  • Create New...