Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Share Posted March 28 (edited) https://archive.org/search.php?query=Folies+Bergère+Upskirt Too bad it was not a RPPC. Card was pricey for a litho. Edited March 28 by Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dom Jaeger Share Posted March 29 That isn't an upskirt pic, it's a harmless promo for the Folies Bergere. Poor choice of words for a title, even if joking. Upskirting is purely for creeps. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Author Share Posted April 1 (edited) Hey, that is an upskirt for the 1890s. Plus I'm a fan of upskirts. Can you elaborate what makes me a creep? And why would you even look at a thread like this Dom? You may be labeled as a creep. Edited April 1 by Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Evan Samaras Share Posted April 1 An upskirt would be a photo that was taken surreptitiously. This looks more like a pose. I take it that would be the difference. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dom Jaeger Share Posted April 1 3 hours ago, Daniel D. Teoli Jr. said: Hey, that is an upskirt for the 1890s. Plus I'm a fan of upskirts. Can you elaborate what makes me a creep? And why would you even look at a thread like this Dom? You may be labeled as a creep. In many places “upskirting” is now illegal. I don’t care what kinks or weird stuff people are into, but there has to be consent. In most cases of upskirting, the victim has not given consent. So yeah, it’s creepy. And illegal. As someone interested in history and documentation I look at most of the things you post Daniel, and usually find them interesting. But if you had posted an actual upskirt photo I would want it removed from the forum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.