Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 I thought it had flopped like decades ago. Or is it making a revival? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted March 8 Premium Member Share Posted March 8 Red's been using it since day one. (Redcode is, or at least certainly was, just JPEG-2000). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Aapo Lettinen Posted March 8 Premium Member Share Posted March 8 It has been used on DCPs the whole time so it is common. But on cameras has been rare, I think the main reason is it requiring lots of processing power to encode and the RED had patent for using it for onboard recorded raw video on cameras so manufacturers ended up using other codecs in-camera. Other codecs are more edit friendly as well, the reason why RED material plays back reasonably well is because it is debayered at fractional resolution instead of full res which makes it lighter to playback but needs even more processing power to encode in-camera and makes the whole thing complicated to do well 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Posted March 8 Author Share Posted March 8 OK, thanks for the replies. I'm mainly on the still end and that is why I don't see it much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now