Jump to content

What does it take to be ASC?


Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

 

I thought of a question today. I don't think it has a straight answer, but could be led to a great topic.

 

What does it take to be ASC?

 

Surely, some of you can answer this for me.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does it take to be ASC?

 

1. A track record of achievement as a cinematographer (for active membership) or in other industry positions related to the art and craft of cinematography (for associate membership).

 

2. An invitation from the ASC board, usually generated by being nominated for such by a current member.

 

3. Sponsorship by 3 current active members.

 

4. Payment of an initiation fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

We don't really keep track of such statistics. By the nature of having to be well-established with some body of work of distinction, it tends to be middle-aged cinematographers who get asked to join. I think Aaron Schneider might have been the youngest to join at the time -- he may have been in his mid or early 30's even.

 

The younger members tends to be around my age, in their 40's.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think you have to be an American citizen. Storaro isn't (I don't think).

 

Being an American citizen is definitely not a requirement. There are a rather big number of non-American cinematographers in the ASC. Emmanuel Luzbeki, Rodrigo Prieto and Guillermo Navarro are three Mexicans in the ASC, among many other nationalities. Those are the names that came to mind . . .

 

It generally is the case that anybody who's got the $10k fee, the recomendation of ASC members and/or the backing of a major studio who can't wait to get the soon-to-be-member on one of their shows AND the SKILL, could become a member. And while it is a most honorable and desireable thing to be accepted in their ranks, some of the members are less well-known and recognized (read talented) than others, including non-members. Having worked in this industry enough to be cynical I would also add that sometimes enrollment is more of an administratve issue more than a merit one. For example, if one is a cinematographer with all the experience and skill needed for the job, a union show WILL NOT, under any circumstance hire one if not a member of ASC or comparable, ellegible union. They can petition the ASC to accept the cinematographer in if they want him or her bad enough. I have worked on shows as location scout where we go on tech scouts with the DP and my pictures sometimes have been better than the DP's, with the director and production designer liking them better. One time the DP's stills were too underexposed and with no contrast, which was a source of embarrasment for him . . . I am not trying to say that I am better than the DP in question, or that the ASC and its rules and members are no good, only that one can be just as talented than the ASC member and still not get a comparable job unless one is in the union.

 

Also, some big time DP's get used to their million dollar budgets and large crews and are simply unable to work under more realistic circumstances . . . Just like everything, I guess, there are good and bad things about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

The ASC is essentially a club not a union, and thus a studio would not petition for the ASC to accept someone.

 

To be accepted into the club is more a symbolic honor than anything directly tangible (for example joining the union directly allows you to work on union shows at union rate, not that you will automatically have union work). To be in the ASC could indirectly help you in the form of helping to get your rates up; it is a mark of a tried and true professional who can create camera work at the highest standards.

 

"Also, some big time DP's get used to their million dollar budgets and large crews and are simply unable to work under more realistic circumstances . . . Just like everything, I guess, there are good and bad things about it."

 

I have learned the higher the budget does not necessarily directly correlate to more resources in MY departments. It often means my crews are paid a proper rate, the actors are better taken care of, and the production department has a nicer trailer/ office.

 

I don't know how many ASC members you have actually seen work, but I have had the fortune of seeing many, and honestly the better ones have their big setups, but primarily kept it simple.

 

I don't know what you mean by realistic conditions, if they have the budget for their gear, then obviously those conditions are realistic for them, maybe not you (or me). Your location stills also have the benefit of being stills (with the ability to really alter them in post, as I see most photographers doing, not to say yours necessarily were). They also have the benefit of you having more or less complete control of when you take them.

 

Kevin Zanit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being an American citizen is definitely not a requirement. There are a rather big number of non-American cinematographers in the ASC. Emmanuel Luzbeki, Rodrigo Prieto and Guillermo Navarro are three Mexicans in the ASC, among many other nationalities. Those are the names that came to mind . . .

 

Just go down the ASC membership list. There are members from every corner of the globe, many who are also members of their own national honorary societies. There are members from Canada, Mexico, Australia, South America, almost every country in Europe, and just about everywhere else. The ASC, while it may have the word "American" in it, and be headquartered in Los Angeles, is truly an international organization.

 

It generally is the case that anybody who's got the $10k fee, the recomendation of ASC members and/or the backing of a major studio who can't wait to get the soon-to-be-member on one of their shows AND the SKILL, could become a member.

 

I don't know where you get this notion from. The ASC has nothing to do with the studios, and studios have no say in who gets invited to join. Only an invitation from the members themselves can get one into the ASC. Studios couldn't care less about the ASC membership status of the cameramen they hire, other than as an indication of a good reputation. The fee is to keep the organization solvent, as any organization - even an honorary one - must be run as a business.

 

For example, if one is a cinematographer with all the experience and skill needed for the job, a union show WILL NOT, under any circumstance hire one if not a member of ASC or comparable, ellegible union. They can petition the ASC to accept the cinematographer in if they want him or her bad enough.

 

You are completely confusing the ASC and the ICG (International Cinematographers' Guild, also known as IATSE Local 600). The ICG is "the union." The ASC is an honorary society, a private organization that has nothing to do with negotiating contracts.

 

Also, some big time DP's get used to their million dollar budgets and large crews and are simply unable to work under more realistic circumstances . . .

 

On the contrary, many "big time DP's" are often among the fastest and most frugal cameramen in terms of how quickly they can work and the package they use. Any experienced cameraman tailors the package to the needs of the individual production, and doesn't ask for what they don't need. They don't always go out with a large package if it isn't warranted, and many are absolute masters at doing a lot with very little. Some even enjoy doing smaller productions for this very reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

The ASC is not the Union (IATSE Local 600) -- people seem to get that confused all the time. Studios can't petition for a DP to join the ASC, nor would they bother. It's an honorary society and the three letters of recommendations from ASC members who personally know the DP is the only way to start the ball rolling for membership. Denis Lenoir, Robert Primes, and Roy Wagner wrote ones for me.

 

There are a number of international cinematographers in the ASC.

 

But the ASC also wants and needs people who will active in serving on committees, going out on panel discussions and lectures at film schools, i.e. actively promoting the cause of cinematography in the public. I serve on a couple of committees, by far the most active being the Technology Committee (so large it is made up of 27 sub-committees and so advanced that it is mostly attended by the Associate members, who are often engineers and other technical experts in the industry) but also the Publications Committee (which deals with the books and magazines published by the ASC, centering around the magazine and the manual.) There is also the nominating committee for membership, the awards ceremony committee, an education committee, etc.

 

I've done my share of features with a tiny crew -- one only had three PA's to help me and the sound man, the other had a two-man grip electric crew with a van with four lights in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
I've done my share of features with a tiny crew -- one only had three PA's to help me and the sound man, the other had a two-man grip electric crew with a van with four lights in it.

 

Just to add to that, if anything, the common complaint I get from crew people is that I try and do their jobs too much (move & adjust lights, set flags, etc.) I enjoy the physical aspect of lighting a scene and coming from low-budget features and video industrials and EPK's, I had to learn to do a lot of that myself. And many ASC members had similar low-budget backgrounds -- few people start at the top afterall.

 

So the trick for me has been to remind myself to let the experienced crew people do their jobs -- sometimes I count to ten or go to the craft service table just to stop myself from moving equipment. But other times, I just get impatient and do it myself. I know that's not being efficient...

 

Sometimes a Gaffer or Key Grip will remark that I must have worked in the past with a lot of bad crews, which is true. It tends to make you rely less on other people, which is too bad when you finally hire reliable people.

 

Truth is, though, that even as the budgets have climbed, I still run into some incompetency in different departments. It can be frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add to that, if anything, the common complaint I get from crew people is that I try and do their jobs too much (move & adjust lights, set flags, etc.)... But other times, I just get impatient and do it myself. I know that's not being efficient...

 

Sometimes a Gaffer or Key Grip will remark that I must have worked in the past with a lot of bad crews, which is true.

 

I think I've read in other threads about your frustrations with gaffers & grips David. And it's funny how you mentioned "set flags". I don't know how many times I've had to raise my voice, walk over and literally SHOW what a grip or gaffer was doing for me by flagging off a light.

 

The term "To Prevent Lens Flare" should be included in all grip books and lists of common terminology among beginner grips & gaffers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Among the terminology book should be a section talking about how the term "Gaffer" is not normally a plural one. On most sets there are not multiple gaffers, there is one gaffer, the gaffer, the head of the electric department. The only other time you run into more than one gaffer is a pre-rigging gaffer or a second unit gaffer.

 

It is grips and electrics, best boy grip and best boy electric and key grip and gaffer. Just my pet peeve . . .

 

Kevin Zanit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

In that instance it is plural, but "frustrations with gaffers & grips", and "among beginner grips & gaffers." just sounds like the million times I see the two jobs incorrectly linked as counter parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that instance it is plural, but "frustrations with gaffers & grips", and "among beginner grips & gaffers." just sounds like the million times I see the two jobs incorrectly linked as counter parts.

Just like how a lot of people think that anyone not the director, producer, cinematographer, or writer on a film is a grip, or when people think that grips handle lights.

 

It annoys me.

 

And when people call silks flags.

 

And when people call every stand a c-stand.

 

And when other departments plug in hair dryers and other stuff into lunchboxes without asking you on the same circuit as a baby junior or blonde and trip the circuit when they turn it on and then the gaffer yells at you for making the light turn off.

 

the list goes on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like how a lot of people think that anyone not the director, producer, cinematographer, or writer on a film is a grip, or when people think that grips handle lights.

 

It annoys me.

 

When someone asks you if you are a grip, just respond with "Do my nuckles drag on the floor?".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When someone asks you if you are a grip, just respond with "Do my nuckles drag on the floor?".

 

Now, that's not very nice.

 

I'm truly thankful for even having the luxury of a grip on some shoots. And some are great...it's just a much bigger ordeal when you have an inexperienced one to whom you have to speak to in longform regarding what equipment you need rigged up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...