jan von krogh Posted February 28, 2009 Posted February 28, 2009 why arent they listed in the "35 mm" section of this forum?
Premium Member John Sprung Posted February 28, 2009 Premium Member Posted February 28, 2009 Because 35mm as used here refers to the photochemical film format, not the image dimensions. I'd agree that HD isn't really the appropriate term, either. These are digital cameras, not TV cameras. Red and D-21 are data cameras, not tape cameras. -- J.S.
jan von krogh Posted February 28, 2009 Author Posted February 28, 2009 Because 35mm as used here refers to the photochemical film format, not the image dimensions. I'd agree that HD isn't really the appropriate term, either. These are digital cameras, not TV cameras. Red and D-21 are data cameras, not tape cameras. -- J.S. i usually decide what lens to use on the format - 35mm and S35 lenses favor sensorbased and mechanical/digital cameras. What has all of this to do with HD, 2K scan 4 cmos etc? The Acaemy award for "Best Cinematography" this year was given to a mainly digital S16 2K production btw.
Brian Drysdale Posted February 28, 2009 Posted February 28, 2009 Also the Genesis, F35 and D21 record on a rather high end HD video format (unless the D21 is outputting Arri RAW). CML splits this into two forums "2k 444 real time" (Full resolution HD non-compressed) and "2k single sensor" (high resolution single sensor non real time) (the RED, SI 2K RAW data type cameras). HD is another forum as is HD prosumer. This can be a bit arbitrary, because the Genesis is listed in the "2k 444 real time", so it's the real time aspect that places it in there. It makes more sense to base the forum title on the "process" rather than the sensor/film size. Perhaps HD & D-Cinema may keep things covered.
John Holland Posted February 28, 2009 Posted February 28, 2009 The "Oscar" won by a production that was shot 40% on 35mm Fuii film and the rest on digital cameras !
Premium Member Brad Grimmett Posted March 1, 2009 Premium Member Posted March 1, 2009 why arent they listed in the "35 mm" section of this forum? Hmm, I didn't know you could run film through any of those cameras. You learn something new every day!
Joe Walker Posted March 1, 2009 Posted March 1, 2009 i usually decide what lens to use on the format - 35mm and S35 lenses favor sensorbased and mechanical/digital cameras. What has all of this to do with HD, 2K scan 4 cmos etc? The Acaemy award for "Best Cinematography" this year was given to a mainly digital S16 2K production btw. Hey speaking of 35mm lenses, what's the status of the new primes you're testing Laguun? Have you got any pics we can look at?
Premium Member Stephen Williams Posted March 1, 2009 Premium Member Posted March 1, 2009 why arent they listed in the "35 mm" section of this forum? Hi, None of the cameras you mention are capable of running 35mm film. Stephen
Emanuel A Guedes Posted March 2, 2009 Posted March 2, 2009 Jan, You've forgot the Canon 5D Mark II. ;) Emanuel :-)
Premium Member Stephen Williams Posted March 2, 2009 Premium Member Posted March 2, 2009 Jan, You've forgot the Canon 5D Mark II. ;) Emanuel :-) Hi, I shot 12 hours of footage with 5 x 5dMK II's over the weekend, they do have some issues. Stephen
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now