Jump to content

Replacing fluorescent tubes - any advice?


Recommended Posts

Hello, everyone! Feeling excited about my first cinematography job and registering on this forum.

We have a scene in a warehouse where I plan to replace the existing tubes with tungsten tubes. Now, I'm puzzled: are film tubes technically equivalent to regular household tubes, or are there some additional considerations to the wattage?

Thank you!

-Ville

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

although some 50hz fluorescent setups can create flicker with some cameras even with 1/50 exposure. there's more possibility for this if some of the fluorescents are in different phase legs or you have "1/50" exposure which is actually NOT one 50th of a second (for example my 5D2 with Magic lantern has only 1/47 instead of 1/50 :blink: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Yes Optima 32's still have a bit of green in them but it can be corrected out. You can try Kino 32's, I've just had them sometimes overload an older ballast, plus they are thicker around because of the plastic sleeve. And I don't think they come in both T8 and T12 pin configuration (correction: I see that they now make T8 versions.) Truth is that it's mainly a price issue, Optima 32's are cheaper so when there are a lot of tubes to switch out, I usually have to go that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth is that it's mainly a price issue, Optima 32's are cheaper so when there are a lot of tubes to switch out, I usually have to go that way.

That's what I suspected. We only have a couple of tubes in the ceiling and a local rental house rents fluorescent tubes for only a couple of euros. I'll ask them about the pin configurations. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I've been looking around for some reasonable T8 tungsten-balanced tubes for a while; nobody seems to sell the Optima 32 outside the USA. If anyone's got any suggestions, I'm all ears.

 

In fact, does the company even exist anymore? duro-test.com is effectively empty.

 

Edit: Here's the skinny. Duro-test, the people who made Optima 32 tubes, went out of business in 2000, so presumably anything still in existence is at least fourteen years old. Some of the staff are now involved in the manufacture and sale of the movie-tone range, so it looks like that's the replacement. Cheap they aren't - in fact, from a quick survey of the site, you might as well buy Kinos.

 

P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Yes, here in the U.S. we use Chroma 50's generally if there are a lot of tubes to replace, again, as Phil pointed out, there may be newer versions of daylight tubes besides Kino 55's. Chroma 50's are a bit greener and warmer than Kino 55's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I've had pretty good results with the Philips stuff. The full descripion, reading from the end of this box that I have here, is "Master TL-D 90 Graphica 36W/950". 5500K seems to be widely considered "American daylight" and were slightly harder than average to obtain. Ask for daylight in the UK and you'll get 6500K, which is of course very cold and blue.

 

There is not really a tungsten equivalent, at least not with such good colour performance. The 3500K in the same range is only about 85.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had pretty good results with the Philips stuff. The full descripion, reading from the end of this box that I have here, is "Master TL-D 90 Graphica 36W/950". 5500K seems to be widely considered "American daylight" and were slightly harder than average to obtain. Ask for daylight in the UK and you'll get 6500K, which is of course very cold and blue.

Well, UK is cloudier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phillips make a TLD-950 which are a daylight balanced high cri tube that perform very well, and match well to Kinos.

They market them under the Graphica, Master or De Luxe names, and are designed for use in colour critical applications.

 

They also do a TLD-930, which performs well as a tungsten balanced tube.

 

Because Kino tubes are designed to be over driven (by all rights they are a 40w tube, with the chemistry designed to produce ideal performance when driven via a kino ballast to 75w) They tend not to play well in domestic fittings, both in terms of lamp performance, and at times working at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I also opted for the Phillips TLD-950s for swapping out tubes on a feature I shot last year... I wish this thread had existed back then - I had a devil of a time uncovering their existence back then (let alone sourcing them!)

 

They're a lot cheaper than Kinos, and I didn't have any real issues with green spikes. I keep some in the cupboard now for similar situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...