Tyler Clark Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Using the C300 I find the look is there using adjustments without throwing on a LUT. Would using this method have negative effects when going to broadcast as opposed to web? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Brereton Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 LUTs are just a shortcut to get you to a usable look very quickly. There are many other ways to get there which are equally valid, as long as the final image remains broadcast legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin R Probyn Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 C300 log is more of a Log lite gamma.. its very much the same as Sony hyper gamma 7/8.. Canon have done this because of the C300 being only 8 bit max.. and cant really handle a true log gamma.. and so its no where near as desaturated/lacking contrast as Sony Slog of Arri LogC .. and so easier to deal with in post.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted January 15, 2016 Premium Member Share Posted January 15, 2016 Yes, Canon-Log is even milder than PanaLog was in the Genesis, it's almost just a low-contrast Rec.709 like HyperGamma. I don't think you absolutely need a LUT to convert it to Rec.709, you just have to adjust the contrast and black levels to taste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin R Probyn Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Re for broadcast.. as Stuart says .. you just need to have your levels.. e.g. white 100% etc legal for broadcast .. nothing to do with the aesthetics in itself.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now