Mike Krumlauf Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Just interested in the steps other users took in grading SLog as there are no (that I know of) LUTs created for SLog 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Mark Kenfield Posted September 29, 2019 Premium Member Share Posted September 29, 2019 I used LUTcalc to create some LUTs that transformed SLOG/SGamut footage over to Sony's LC709A Rec709 LUT. And another that converted SLOG/SGamut to SLOG3/SGamut3.cine so that I could drop the more common LUTs for the F5(5), FS7, Venice etc. on to the F35/F3 footage with minimal fuss. I really liked what I was getting from the Venice's S709 LUT when layered onto the converted SLOG footage. Gives lovely colours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Field Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Is it any different from the SLOG in the F900? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Brereton Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 8 hours ago, Max Field said: Is it any different from the SLOG in the F900? I would have thought that any form of Log on an 8 bit, 3:1:1 camera was a bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Field Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 4 minutes ago, Stuart Brereton said: I would have thought that any form of Log on an 8 bit, 3:1:1 camera was a bad idea. It's 10bit 4:2:2 for me, I don't use the tape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Brereton Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 4 minutes ago, Max Field said: It's 10bit 4:2:2 for me, I don't use the tape I didn’t even know the F900 could do Log. Last time I used one was about 100 years ago ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Krumlauf Posted October 1, 2019 Author Share Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) On 9/29/2019 at 5:38 PM, Stuart Brereton said: I didn’t even know the F900 could do Log. Last time I used one was about 100 years ago ? Honestly it cant... not like the F23 or F35. I had a Panavisied F900 and its "Log" was nothing compared to what the F23 and F35 can do. Also the 10bit 4:2:2 had CCD artifacting that was a pain in the butt to deal with. The F900's sensor was not built for true log.. its stuck in the REC709 world. If you pushed the hell out of it like you can the 23 and 35 you just got a useless noisy image. Edited October 1, 2019 by Mike Krumlauf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Krumlauf Posted October 1, 2019 Author Share Posted October 1, 2019 On 9/29/2019 at 9:10 AM, Max Field said: Is it any different from the SLOG in the F900? Yes, very different. The sensors in the F23 and 35 are far superior to that in the F900 and F900R. The F900 does not natively have SLOG either, it needs to be remade in CVP FIle Editor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now