Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Premium Member
Posted (edited)
On 12/12/2023 at 12:01 PM, Geffen Avraham said:

Hey, I'm curious to know more about this. For the types that fit between VF and camera, how do they get a beam splitter and sensor in so thin? And wouldn't you need a rather high ISO?.......

As an example, the AZ Spectrum ACL taps are inside a box about 19.5mm wide. This displacement of the VF doesn't really affect operating, and there is room for the beam splitter and camera inside. I assume the camera is like a lipstick camera oriented longitudinally. Little beam splitters, triangular prisms with a partially silvered surface that will deflect, say 20% into the tap camera, are cheap on eBay.

I once tried removing an AZ Spectrum tap from the optical path of an ACL (with big Kinoptik VF) and found that the eyepiece diopter adjustment was unusably out of whack. Memory is hazy, but I don't think simple shimming fixed it. I asked Paul Scaglione and Andrjez if they made optical mods to the ACL VF when installing the vid tap, like adding a neg diopter, but I never got a definitive answer. Weirdly, I think I tried the same thing with a camera having the Ang orientable finder, and did not have that problem.

If you use a 20mm VF displacement as a start point, you could test your VF eyepiece diopter adjustment with a crude 20mm shim. It will show if optical adjustment is needed. There is room at the camera end of the VF to add a neg diopter element, but I wondered if the pro techs just shift the existing  optical elements at that end.

I like the idea of a tap that replaces the optical VF for steadicam, jib arms etc, but I'm not excited about plural remote monitors or focusing off the monitor. A lot of focusing can be done with the optical eyepiece, and most carefully controlled shots used to be at  measured focus.

Gregg

Edited by Gregg MacPherson
more words
  • Premium Member
Posted
31 minutes ago, Gregg MacPherson said:

... a partially silvered surface that will deflect, say 20% into the tap camera.....

Sorry, hasty language...I meant reflect, not deflect...

Posted
On 12/18/2023 at 12:13 PM, Gregg MacPherson said:

 like the idea of a tap that replaces the optical VF for steadicam, jib arms etc, but I'm not excited about plural remote monitors or focusing off the monitor. A lot of focusing can be done with the optical eyepiece, and most carefully controlled shots used to be at  measured focus.

Gregg

Thank you! I will try something like that!

I think the true solution to focusing film cameras is with some kind of depth/ToF camera. There is a company now selling a $24,000 "AI focus" solution, but I think it can be practically replicated for under $2,000 with an OAK depth camera and a Jetson Nano.

They also have IR illumination, so they will work in total darkness. If you can calibrate one, you can start with a truly accurate focusing assist screen, and the added Jetson will let you pick objects and lock onto them, if you can get it to control a Tilta motor.

  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)

Hey everyone. Hope you are all doing fine. So it's been a while since the last post but just checking in, odes someone has step-by-step directions to build a DIY Video Assist (for dummies like me)? For example with a raspberry camera module? I think the bmpcc is also a good solution but a bit bulky.

Follow up question does someone know people that can manufacture a cage and baseplate for an Eclair ACL 2? Les Bosher is really swamped right know I guess. 

Thanks and best,

Malte 

 

Edited by Malte Proeckl

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...