Brian Hatfield Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 Hello all, I am hoping that someone can answer my questions here. I am planning on shooting a 20 min. narrative short on a BMPCC 4K Cinema Camera. I will be using the BRAW 3:1 at 2.6K in a 16:9 aspect ratio, at 24 FPS. Once it is edited and color corrected and sound design is applied, I will take a digital file and send it to either CineLab in Massachusetts, or Colorlab in Rockville, MD for a filmout negative and a 16mm print. I am thinking that the lab will be able to make a 4:3 squeezed print from the 16:9 image. Is this even possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Phillips Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 I would think its possible, but it wont do you any good if you want to project it given you'd need a non standard desqueeze lens on the projector. If you're doing this as a backup for archival purposes its probably fine so long as you tape desqueeze instructions to the box. But I would talk with the labs about this, especially if you want to include sound on the film Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Dunn Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 Curious about your reasoning. A widescreen print is (was) common enough on 16mm. We even had one at college, paying extra for a burnt-in 1.66 mask on a C-roll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted April 27, 2023 Premium Member Share Posted April 27, 2023 It would be hard enough to find places to project it in 16mm but very few have anamorphic lenses and those were 2X so would only make sense for a scope image. For anything 1.66, 1.77, 1.85, etc. a matted image was more likely in the past. You'd need a 1.3X or 1.4X anamorphic projector lens to show 1.77 squeezed onto 1.33. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Hatfield Posted April 27, 2023 Author Share Posted April 27, 2023 Thank you all for your input. I am now thinking of putting the same file to 35mm, although I know that it would be expensive. I would have it recorded to and Inter-Negative, then from there, taking it through a print pipeline. I'll be researching this some more, ty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Sponsor Robert Houllahan Posted April 28, 2023 Site Sponsor Share Posted April 28, 2023 We have done plenty of digital to 16mm with an anamorphic squeeze, most for recording and re-scan. It would not be a problem to make a squeezed 1.33 print with sound and de-squeeze it in projection with a anamorphic projection lens, there are plenty of them on eBay. Just be aware of the very narrow sound on 16mm which is mono and frequency and DR limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now