-
Posts
1,001 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Gregory Irwin
-
With all do respect Jean-Louis, there are not many out there on set with your qualifications. Thus, the disaster. I have a physical optics background and I would be reluctant to do that - in the field and with time constraints. I agree with you about diopters degrading an image but I would argue that any lens wide open is a degraded image in many ways. If it's a trade off of a degraded image when compared to an out of focus image, I would choose the former. Especially when referring to such a wide angle. G
-
Loosening screws on a wide angle lens?? Risky!! That sounds like a depth of FOCUS disaster in the making. I would go with diopters. By the way, how many names do you post under Sir Power? So... Complicated. G
-
Shutter speed and shutter angle
Gregory Irwin replied to Richard El Asmar's topic in General Discussion
I love the staccato and the legato comparision. Right on! G -
If you are doing a lot of digital work, I would add an Arctic Butterfly (non static brush), especially designed for sensor cleaning, a bulb syringe for the same thing and a lit loop magnifier for inspecting the cleanliness of the sensor. Keep your kit simple. Don't overwhelm yourself with crap you won't use or need. G
- 7 replies
-
- arri production bag
- ac kit
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi Jordan, I would say that besides your tools and follow focus gear, your list consists of mainly expendable purchases that production would pay for. I wouldn't spend your own money on tape, air, etc. G
- 7 replies
-
- arri production bag
- ac kit
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I've never used them Dom. What glass is inside? G
-
I had lasek several years ago and had 6 great years. Now my eyes have not only returned to where they were before, they're worse! Old age is a b*@ch!
-
I had lasek several years ago and had 6 great years. Now my eyes have not only returned to where they were before, they're worse! Old age is a b*#@t! :)
-
Sadly, contacts don't work for me. The picture was taken in 2009 on THE FIGHTER. I only needed "cheaters" to see close as Stuart observed back then. Those days are over. Now, it's a pair of full time bi-focals. :(
-
Yep. An unfortunate byproduct of aging.
-
Thank you Phil Rhodes for writing a wonderful article! And my apologies for this shameless self promotion. http://www.redsharknews.com/business/item/1827-meet-the-crew-gregory-irwin,-camera-assistant
-
I'm the New Guy Here.
Gregory Irwin replied to Robert Schuette's topic in Students, New Filmmakers, Film Schools and Programs
Welcome to the board! G -
Sorry Bill. I just read this post. The Safety Classes are organized by OSHA and basically can state that all IATSE employees have been certified in a series of on set safety practices. This is really just a layer of protection for the studios to limit their liability. They can say in case of an accident: That employee should have known better. He/she was certified in that area of safety. As for a safety officer, there is supposed to be one on set at all times. In reality, we rarely see one. G
-
That's a good start. All of the responsible people who were in charge and instructing the crew should be held liable for this criminal act - including the ADs, locations and the DP! If any member of my crew had been present (much more experienced than the young crew there), no one would have gone onto that rail without the proper authority. We simply would have said no. But when you are young, inexperienced and mostly trustful of your leadership and afraid of not doing your job for adverse repercussions, you tend to blindly do anything. That's what happened here. I want to see more of those responsible go to jail for the senseless and tragic death of an aspiring young woman. G
-
The End of Unpaid Interns in the Film Business?
Gregory Irwin replied to Tim Tyler's topic in Business Practices & Producing
Yeah, I remember when I used to believed that. G -
Help choosing filters
Gregory Irwin replied to Greg Mcfarlane King's topic in Lenses & Lens Accessories
Sorry that I've been absent Gregg. My schedule has been a bit brutal. We just wrapped FAST & FURIOUS 7 in Central California and immediately flew to New Orleans for TERMINATOR 5. I guess we just do numbered movies nowadays! With regards to Tiffen vs. Schneider, I appreciate all of the above postings and research on the subject. But in my opinion, Tiffen has always had a greenish tint to their NDs and diffusion filters. You can really see it in digital. Schneider has a true neutral color to their glass. In the end, you have to go with your instincts with what works for you. For me, Schneider works perfectly. G -
I consider them trade schools for those who cannot qualify for film school. G
- 6 replies
-
- Film school
- Student
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I want to ask you something about getting a job
Gregory Irwin replied to jaehak cho jh's topic in Lighting for Film & Video
Not on a union show. The union minimum for a 60 hour work week (5 consecutive 12 hour days) would be just under $7000/week. And many work for much more. Adrian, that is crazy and frightening! -
I want to ask you something about getting a job
Gregory Irwin replied to jaehak cho jh's topic in Lighting for Film & Video
"Both LA and NY have a good deal of ultra low budget films which may pay around $100~300/day for a DoP with equipment." Seriously???!!! What do the ACs typically earn? How much non- union work is out there and what type of jobs? Sorry, I don't want to appear so,shocked - although I am. G -
Help choosing filters
Gregory Irwin replied to Greg Mcfarlane King's topic in Lenses & Lens Accessories
My camera rental company, Latitude 33 Motion Picture Services, has owned numerous filters sets over the years. In the end, nothing compares to Schneider. Their quality is far superior than Tiffen and is an industry standard. I have several clients who will not settle for any other manufacturer. G -
Bruckheimer; Tom Cruise Top Gun 2
Gregory Irwin replied to James Steven Beverly's topic in General Discussion
I'll tell you what... I'd work on it in a heartbeat! It would be a blast!,, G -
Are we talking about light levels or gates? If gates, cameras have larger gates in order to see beyond the frame lines. We call it "full aperture". We can see things about to enter frame before they do and monitor things such as microphones, boomed overhead to see their relation to the frame line. Projectors simply have the need to project the aspect ratio and thus are matted to reflect such. With reference to gate hairs, if they appear in full aperture, they most likely are not in frame and not a problem. That's what make 2 perf so tricky. The aspect ratio is full aperture. Hairs are always in frame. G