Radoslav Karapetkov

Yeah, Firefox is cool.

I'd humbly suggest that you could use download managers. There's even free ones, like this: http://www.freedownloadmanager.org/ It allows for a lot of things among better speed and also *resuming* the download, in case the connection broke down or some other malfunction occured. For example, if you were downloading a [large] file and the connection broke down on 98% of the download - it's a pain. But with a download manager, you could resume the download from 98 % on and not from the beginning all over again. Hope that I'm helping.

I'm not a web detective, I don't know what's the real case, and thus - I don't have an opinion pro or contra anyone. It seems that the moderators at reduser checked these users and found that the IP is identical [with yours]. How did that happen? There are solutions for that, but I won't make any further comments. :ph34r: In anyway, playing hide and seek games on forums doesn't make much sense.

IPs are tricky bastards. B)

Good, cause it's actually a plasma canon. The camera outfit is just for cover.

May his soul rest in peace...

I wholeheartedly agree with these two bits. For the DI of Skull, it is 2K, if I'm not mistaken.

Hmm, I expected a production of this level to get a 4K DI\filmout...

I personally was amazed by The New World. It is so deep, that I think it's early for me to make a more detailed comment about it. But I was just... amazed. It kept me thinking for hours and not many movies have such effect on me. There were, of course, a few things that I didn't like, but in general - it was a special experience watching this film. Visually, it is one of the most beautifully-shot films I've seen in my life. For that I'm sure. Just adding my 2c to the thread. The fact that artists of this kind choose Red [even only for a few shots] says a lot.

OK, dreaming is free. So, if it's a DREAM camera, then it should definitely have: - 65mm sensor which should be: - 8K [if CMOS Bayer], so that we could have full-luma+full-chroma mindblowing 4K out of it. - or a 4K [future FoveoNx3 type of cinema sensor] - RAW. There's no going back from RAW, that's for sure. - 120 fps at 8K. [OMG, uncompressed RAW from 8K would be... 1,3 GB\sec for 24 fps and... what? - ~ 6GB\sec for 120 fps... OK, that's futuristic :) ] - Random sampling. - Record to SSD drives. - The camera should be called: "RED Lawrence" :) - under 30k $... Ok, under 50k $ :)..... O-oh, ok, under 100k $ :(. ... But for the moment... A Scarlet would do :).

Thanks. Sometimes I seem to be overzealous in my pursuit of simplicity.

Very good answer! The story is what matters and how the audience perceives it. The behind-the-scenes stuff is for us filmmakers, so that we can have fun. :) Peace.

Hi y'all, I was wondering what would you think of this short we did: On Vimeo If you have 5 mins. to watch, I'd be happy to know your thoughts. Thanks.

Thant's the one, thanks.

There was a topic at RedUser for potentially adapting a RED One camera to become a 4K film scanner. Cannot find it, though.