Moises Perez

I meant to say "hoping" not "hopping" MOY

I also received the email from Kodak with a subject line that read: "Sci-Fi meets Super 8 with Cara Delevingne" I was very disappointed with the film that I reply right away letting them know my feelings, and hopping they change the way they use and promote this camera. Here is what I said in my email: Hello, My name is Moises Perez, a.k.a. MOY. I'm a Super 8 filmmaker. I just want to say that I'm very disappointed with all the footage I've seen so far from this "NEW CAMERA" And specially with this Cara Delevingne's Sci-Fi footage because it looks just OUT OF FOCUS. I hope this was an artistic choice rather than the lack of cinematography skills, or even worst, I hope this is not the camera's inability to focus an image correctly. If so, you guys need to correct this issue before the release of the camera to the public. This problem, in my opinion, would kill the Super 8mm film market and specially this great opportunity of developing a brand new camera for this great film format. I also hope to get an answer from you. Sincerely, MOY I must say that they haven't yet responded to me.

Hello everybody, I was hoping to find the Kodak Super 8 film camera at the NAB2017, but I haven't have any luck. Does anyone knows what happened to that project? MOY

David, Thank you for your response, please let me know if there is anything I can help you with. Best, MOY

Hi David, Any good news on your design?

Hi David, I would suggest you do more research and consider the use of an interchangeable mount module. A removable square module that could be screwed in with four simple screws. For example, you could design a C-mount, Pl, and MFT (Micro Four Thirds) mounts modules. There would be different options and those who buy the camera. We, as I would be one of the first to buy one of these cameras as I did with the Logmar, could choose what mount we want and we could also purchase the other modules for other lenses if they we wish. To get sold on a single mount would not be the best option in my humble opinion. And of course, make it silent please. So far, it has been the major draw back for both, the Logmar and the Kodak cameras alike. A 200ft and even 400ft film magazine would also be necessary for professional work. Keep up with the good work.

Andries, Very interesting sites, and yes, it's crazy to know that more languages other than English are also very active when it comes to talk and discuss topics about the true universal language, film. MOY

Could you guys share your favorite Super 8mm film internet websites? MOY

I found this site by accident. It’s full of interesting facts and personal opinions. Check it out. MOY https://www.facebook.com/groups/27648968851/

I'll second you on this Anthony. I think we all need to contact Kodak and let them know what is what we think about current prices. MOY

Does it work? Has anybody used it? Is it worth the investment? Thanks, MOY

I must say that I miss an optical viewfinder in my Logmar. In my opinion, the new Logmar Mini "professional version" should include: an optical viewfinder, an LCD screen, SDI as well as HDMI outputs. I know... I'm dreaming. MOY

Let alone the hot models, I'm also bugging them about designing a Super 8mm film gate for it as an option. But of course as we all know this will represent a big problem for the current design since the scanner is sprocket driven. I had the opportunity to see it in action at the SMPTE 2015 in Hollywood back in October, but again I haven't heard anything since then. I just sent them an email two days ago but there's been no answer yet. MOY

Hi Nicholas, I can't see the reason for that, but anything is possible now. MOY

I couldn't agree more with you Carl, being myself a proud owner of the original Logmar Super 8 Film Camera. MOY