Jump to content

Matthew Ballard

Basic Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    8

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Matthew Ballard

  • Rank
    New

Profile Information

  • Occupation
    Cinematographer
  • Location
    Los Angeles

Recent Profile Visitors

1763 profile views
  1. Matthew Ballard
    PMd.
  2. Matthew Ballard
    pmd
  3. Matthew Ballard
    PMing you
  4. Matthew Ballard
    Nice to meet you Dave! Looking forward to the updates. Tyler where are you teaching in LA?
  5. Matthew Ballard
    It's a shame really... It's odd that they are literally no where in Los Angeles. Good to find that some other people shared the same struggle, hah. Thanks for the input Christopher.
  6. Matthew Ballard
    Great, thanks so much for the info David.
  7. Matthew Ballard
    Hey Tyler. As David said, I do believe the Hawk makes 1.3x for the S35 sensor. Since the C300 is 1920x1080 I would really not to prefer to extract a 2.35 out of the 2x as we would be losing significant resolution. I am already planning on trying to work with Panavision in the future. For this project though we don't have to pay for the C300 and of course the budget is quite tight. Hey Adrian, I think it would but it would just be too wide and then you would have to pillar box the image as I stated above. The C300 comes in both PL and EF and I will be using the PL mount. I
  8. Matthew Ballard
    Hey guys! I hope you are all doing well. I have a short film coming up soon that will be on the C300 mk1 (due to my film school's availability) and I am looking for some advice on using them with the Hawk 1.3x V-lites. It seems that it should work in theory but have not seen any examples of people doing this in the past. Since the C300 mk1 does not have a desqueeze, I already anticipate having to get a third party monitor (SmallHD?) to desqueeze. Also they seem to be quite a hard lens to track down even here in Los Angeles. Does anyone have any recommendations on where to find th
×
×
  • Create New...