William Mckay Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Hello all, I've read as much as I can about super 16 zooms here and elsewhere for a few months. Prior to a purchase, I wonder if any film shooters familiar with the following zooms could chime in about shooting a whole feature on one. I just watched Leaving Las Vegas again, which was apparently the Canon 8-64. It looked fantastic. Walking Dead uses a 10.6-180, also great. That lens is hard to find. I've been looking at the Angenieux 7-81, which seems bulky and requires support. It's 5 lbs versus the Canon 8-64/7-63's, which are 4.5lbs. There's not much out there on the Angie. Does the Angenieux breathe too much too use as a main lens? Is it much sharper than the canons - ie, worth dealing with the extra weight and support? A little scared to brace a lens, or deal with diverting pressure from the PL mount. The Canon 7-63 seems like an improvement over the 8-64. Half of the 8-64's have numbers but don't have witness marks on the barrel, some do. Of the 7-81, 7-63, 8-64 which would you recommend for a feature? Thanks so very much in advance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Dom Jaeger Posted February 20, 2013 Premium Member Share Posted February 20, 2013 They're all good really, not much between them optically. The 7-81 is actually about the same size and weight as the 7-63, maybe even a little thinner. The main drawback to the Angenieux is that it loses light at the long end, it's T2.4 until 50mm then T3.5 to 81mm. Focus marks are also a little haphazard on the feet scale ( ie 3'6" then 5'6" then 8' etc). It breathes more than the Canons, but not badly, nothing like the Zeiss 11-110 for example. If you're considering buying one, get whichever one has been the best maintained. With older zooms, condition is more important than anything. For that reason renting can often be a safer option, particularly if a whole feature depends on the one lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Burke Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 If you are getting a steal on any of those lenses ie: $5k, then buy it. If you are approaching or over 10k and the lens is really just for this feature, then rent a better one, like Dom suggested. Canon 6.6 x 66 perhaps. I have used a 8-64 many times and love the contrast that it produces, but have never used the Angenieux. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Mckay Posted February 20, 2013 Author Share Posted February 20, 2013 Dom / anyone, Does the 7-63 require support? I see it is a little bulkier than the 8-64, which I gather seems to be okay for many without a support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Dom Jaeger Posted February 21, 2013 Premium Member Share Posted February 21, 2013 It's probably OK without a support on a PL mount camera, as long as the camera doesn't get jolted. You'd definitely want to remove the zoom from the camera during transport (which was always the professional procedure in the past, but lately I've noticed people transporting cameras with lenses attached - yikes!) Add a clamp-on matte box and filters and you'd be pushing it. Personally I'd recommend a support, but I tend to err on the safe side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Drysdale Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 I don't recall TV people normally removing 16mm zoom lenses when transporting their camera in the crew car on normal roads during a production, although they may do so on dramas. There was a range of ready to shoot camera cases that allowed this. However, you'd want to remove the lens when transporting by air or by courier companies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Mckay Posted February 26, 2013 Author Share Posted February 26, 2013 I should have mentioned in my original post. We do have the choice between a zoom and Zeiss mk3 primes, but probably not both. We wanted the speed of a zoom. However.. Our focus puller is experienced but not a veteran. Would we be safer with primes and to stay away from zooms due to the fewer marks? Or they similar in terms of marks/rotation? Stuck in the south with no place to view/test these lenses. : ) Thanks so much for the guidance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Horwell Posted March 23, 2013 Share Posted March 23, 2013 william, i have a Canon 11.5 - 138 i am probably selling if your interested drop me a line indiefilmltd@mac.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now