Perhaps I'm looking at my situation and not the situation of a studio which shoots a few features a year. I've had multiple years of producing weekly shorts (2-6 minutes) and while working with film would've made them visually better, it just doesn't seem as feasible for people without budgets.
I can't include the cost of a PC (I spend $1100 on one every 6 years) because I already use that machine in my day to day life, technology runs everything for me as it is. Including the cost of a high end PC feels like including the cost of your personal car because you used it for a driving shoot. Also (probably also exclusive to my situation) if I shoot film I plan on scanning and editing it digitally either way.
Assuming all lights and rigs are similar value, let's say I shoot 40 four minute shorts in a year, 10:1 take ratio, with a RED One MX and a couple decent lenses. The camera with all of it's necessary accessories costed me $3100. 2 decent lenses (1 zoom and 1 prime) costed me $1800 together.
With hard drives that can be formatted again and again the cost I'm putting in regarding recording media and putting it onto my PC will stick at $5000 (tacking on an extra hundred).
Now obviously when shooting film, one cannot be as sloppy with their take ratio as Bill and Satsuki pointed out. Let's say for the film end of things, I drop the take ratio to 6:1 and will shoot 24p. I saw an Arriflex SR 16mm camera (all necessary accessories) with a zoom lens going for $2900 flat (tests I've seen of it blow away the RED for me) and getting TWO additional prime lenses; the total comes to $3400. So far much cheaper.
And then the film itself. I do a lot of indoor shooting, so I'd be going for Kodak vision3 500T color film in 400 ft rolls from B&H at $210 per roll. To meet the 6:1 shooting ratio film required I'd need 87 400ft rolls for the year coming to a total of $18,270. Then getting it all developed would cost (at Cinelabs) about $6900. I could purchase a RetroScan Universal for $4500 to save on 2k scans.
One year of shooting 24p projects on film with 6:1 take ratio in total would come to $33,070.
Let's assume I keep it up for 5 years. With digital, I could purchase another PC ($2000 for safe measure) and a top of the line ARRI Alexa with all accesories (26000) bringing the 5 year stretch to $33,000.
Sticking with that Arriflex and its 400 ft rolls/developing, an analog 5 year stretch would be $133,750.
I understand there are companies out there offering bulk discounts, but I'm failing to see how any bulk benefits can get a 6 digit lump down to the ballpark of $40k. What am I calculating wrong? Is the usual take ratio 2:1 for film? Please help me understand this.