Landon D. Parks Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 (edited) The JVC line of cameras are an interesting study. I've not seen anything from them that screams amazing, or out of the ordinary. Personally though, those cameras are just more noise in a sea of better options. If you're looking to spend roughly $3,000, one of the entry level URSA cameras is likely a better option for controlled environments - since you actually get the ability to record RAW and 10-bit ProRes without an external recorder, and you get Blackmagics cinematic-looking images compared to the rather 'video' looking JVC images. I have never worked with JVC cameras before though, so I can't say for sure. Edited February 1, 2018 by Landon D. Parks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted February 1, 2018 Premium Member Share Posted February 1, 2018 The LS300 is really interesting. I'm not sure it's a cinema camera, particularly, but it has some very useful features. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Adrian Sierkowski Posted February 1, 2018 Premium Member Share Posted February 1, 2018 JVC has always been a bit of an odd duck-- but personally I think their whole market is much more the ENG/EFP area and Docu/Reality-- where they're a more affordable sony/panasonic/canon. Not that they're bad, per say, I have fond memories of the GY700 (i think that was the model) they're just not something you'd particularly encounter in narrative, commercial, or MV environments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted February 2, 2018 Premium Member Share Posted February 2, 2018 Who needs low light? Film has been maxed out at 500 ISO + 1 stop or two forever? Yet, there are plenty of super beautiful low-light scenes in movies going back to the days of 125iso. So do we really need high-ISO? No absolutely not and I shoot A LOT in low-light and it always comes out great. So IDK... I for one would rather have a good cinematic camera then low-light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landon D. Parks Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 (edited) Usually, high ISO's are not chosen when shooting a film. Of course, this is starting to change now that more people shooting films have access to the high ISO settings. Higher ISO settings are more handy for run-and-gun and gorilla-style setups, documentaries, or ENG. Edited February 2, 2018 by Landon D. Parks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Orlando Posted February 2, 2018 Author Share Posted February 2, 2018 I can now have a BMCC mft with two spare batteries, an external monitor for less than $ 1100. When I watch this I think I'm going to go for it, what the heck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted February 2, 2018 Premium Member Share Posted February 2, 2018 Usually, high ISO's are not chosen when shooting a film. Of course, this is starting to change now that more people shooting films have access to the high ISO settings. Higher ISO settings are more handy for run-and-gun and gorilla-style setups, documentaries, or ENG. It's all an excuse for not lighting. People have been shooting run and gun gorilla style films forever without lights or minimal lighting. Today with LED panels being small, bright and adjustable color temp, there is no excuse. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devin Gibson Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Hey buddy the 2.5k is called the baby Alexa for a reason. You will absolutely love that camera, its a beast and dont worry about the form factor etc, none of that stuff matters to a filmmaker whos willing to tell stories and not make any excuses as to why they wont make something. I own that camera as well as an Alexa classic and I tell you there is nothing easy to handle with the Alexas form factor, its huge and you need a ton of stuff to move around freely but guess what? Who cares!!!!!!! What kind of excuse is form factor. Im glad you asked this question on this form and Im telling you the 2.5k is beautiful so are all the other cameras you mentioned. Nothing at that price point will compare to the 2.5k at all. the pocket has the same exact image but not the same resolution which simply means the 2.5k will provide more detail is all. The pocket was only made to accompany the 2.5k and was created to use in tighter spots and shots that would be impossible with other cameras. Dont believe that 2.5k is dead or that 4K is better. Just run with it, its a great camera to learn cinematography, screw all the FPN talk and shoot at any ISO that your scene requires. Techy people will be the only ones crying over this stuff meanwhile our audience is crying over our storytelling go for it now!!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Orlando Posted February 4, 2018 Author Share Posted February 4, 2018 I agree, What matters is image quality, and now that external monitors and batteries are getting cheaper the BMCC is more relevant than ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landon D. Parks Posted February 5, 2018 Share Posted February 5, 2018 Problem is, finding a good used BMCC. Too bad they stopped making them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Orlando Posted February 5, 2018 Author Share Posted February 5, 2018 What do you mean a good used BMCC? If you find one on ebay what could be the problem with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landon D. Parks Posted February 5, 2018 Share Posted February 5, 2018 No, I mean finding them in general. IF you can find one, most are probably in good shape. As for what could be wrong with a used camera - any number of things could be wrong with it, at least in theory - it is a piece of electronic equipment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Peterson Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 I'd avoid the BMCC EF like the plague (because... EF mount! Ugh)BMCC MFT is nice at that price, but I'd rather go for the BMMCC (Blackmagic Micro Cinema Camera) as it has an identical image but in a smaller form factor and gives you 60fps slow motion. BMD URSA 4.6K Pro is the best from BMD, and is well under $10KBut if we're focused on the BMCC perhaps you budget is much lower or you'd just have mentioned the URSA Mini Pro already? Now if we start considering outside the BMD range, it can become quite "subjective" your choices (even though there are many more GOOD choices out there). And can all depend on your priorities and tastes. Tonnes of options (from a bit under $10K, to waaaay under $10K), just to mention a very small selection:Panasonic EVA1 / GH5 / GH5SSony FS7 / F5 / F55 / F65 (yeah I saw once a secondhand F65 go for just under $10K, CRAZY!)Kinefinity Terra 4K or 6KArri Alexa Classic RED ONE / RED SCARLET MX / RED EPIC MX / etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Peterson Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 The BMCC was a marvellous and maddening machine. The picture (kept within its limits) is remarkably good - I used it as a B-camera to the Sony F3 on my first feature some years back, and it was incredible how closely it could match to the $20,000 F3. Ergonomically, it's mostly a nightmare (except for crashcam-type setups, where its all-in-one style is perfect), but for a primary camera, it requires a lot of rigging to make it usable. The rolling shutter isn't great, and it doesn't like being pushed more than about half a stop beyond it's 800 ISO rating. But if you have no money, and can find one with all the necessary rigging gack included - then it's certainly capable of delivering images that you can use. Today you can buy a Sony PMW-F3 for around the same price as a BMCC. Which is almost quite unbelievable! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Orlando Posted February 6, 2018 Author Share Posted February 6, 2018 Yes, it's an issue money. I might consider the GH5s, once I can see more footage of it. I'm aware of the Ursa 4.6K and I've looked at some used RED ONE too. Nothing is as cheap than a BMCC MFT that can be found now for around $ 1000 on ebay and the image quality of the URSA 4.6 and from those older RED is marginally better than what a BMCC can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Peterson Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 If Panasonic GH5 / GH5S doesn't appeal to you and you really want to keep your budget around $2K or under then I seriously reckon you should go for a Blackmagic Micro Cinema Camera or a Sony PMW-F3 (or maybe the Sony FS700, but you'd have to be very lucky to get that with an Atomos Shogun and not end up pushing the budget too far past $2K). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Orlando Posted February 6, 2018 Author Share Posted February 6, 2018 What makes you believe that the Blackmagic Micro Cinema Camera is better than the BMCC 2.5K MFT with a speedbooster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Peterson Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 The big two: 60fps (sweet sexy slow motion!) + smaller size & weight (important if rigging, say an overhead shot or onto a car. Also very important if using with a gimbal) The expansion port is also interesting, if you want to use the Micro on a drone, or another handy use I've seen people design shoulder rigs so you've got more control of the Micro from the grip handle. But everything else is just gravy on top after those big first two points. I'd even be willing to pay a premium for them over the BMCC! (but you don't need to, as they're around the same price now. But if the BMMCC went on half price sale like the BMPCC did the I'd snap up a Micro in a heart beat!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Adrian Sierkowski Posted February 7, 2018 Premium Member Share Posted February 7, 2018 Micro is a nifty little thing that's for sure. Also the LP-e6 battery is very nice and I find SD cards substantially easier to work with on set -v- SSDs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Orlando Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 I'm looking more that that Micro! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Peterson Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 In my eyes the two best cameras from BMD are:URSA Mini 4.6K Pro (the non-Pro version is not that much cheaper, but the Pro is so much betterMicro Cinema Camera (is like the peak of development of the BMCC => BMPCC => BMMCC series) As we can ignore anything with the 4K sensor (welllll.... if I saw the URSA Mini 4K at a crazy low price like US$1.5K secondhand or lower then maybe I couldn't say no!). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Orlando Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 But don't you think that we're losing something with the Micro Cinema Camera and the BMPCC compared to the BMCC that is 2.5K? Don't you think that the added resolution is worth getting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Peterson Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 There is only a small difference in resolution between 2.5K and 1080And if you're not shooting in raw (95% of the time I am not, and I presume any one buying an ultra low budget camera is also not, especially if say they're doing a long project like a feature film or a web series) then there is basically ZERO difference between the ProRes HQ of the BMPCC , BMCC , and BMMCC (maybe some careful A/B testing can find some hairs to split) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Orlando Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 True, I shouldn't be in hair splitting at by budget level and I just looked a a picture comparing the different format using rectangles, yes, the difference between 1080 and 2.5K is almost trivial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Orlando Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 David, when I go on B&H it seems that people still like the BMPCC more than the Micro! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now