steveb40 Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 (edited) Hello everyone. PLease allow some time for it to download. http://www.insomniacreations.com/bartolozz...amefilthqb.html thanks, -steve Edited February 24, 2005 by steveb40 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eggart Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 I have a cheesy notebook like that... What kind of film did you shoot this on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Greenfield Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 While I'm not a fan of this kind of story, and I did notice the small production flaws (hair on the lens a couple of times, odd cuts occasionally), I think your direction and angles were fantastic. I also can very much respect that you shot this on film and not DV. Nice Job overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landon D. Parks Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 (edited) I think DV would have better fit this project. Being black and white I dont think format really matters. However, here is tha famous.. LANDON PARKS REVIEW Acting: D- Story: D Visuals: D Overal: D :) out of :) :) :) :) :) "OK Film.... VERY Amaturish though." Not enough dolly moves and the acting is rather boring. The lighting is also vert flat." Edited February 27, 2005 by Landon D. Parks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tim Carroll Posted February 27, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted February 27, 2005 Steve, Very interesting, nice job. Not my kind of topic, but nice camera work and I too would like to commend you on using film. A couple of shots looked like they were from an old Bolex I had, the exposure was flickering from shutter bounce, a common Bolex issue. I disagree with the post that said it would have been just as good shot on DV. I think the way you shot it on Black and White film, and the lighting, gave it its most appealing aspect. That dirty, gritty, sometimes out of focus look. Are you a film student? Planning on being a director? A cinematographer? I think your film shows some real promise. Good luck. -Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 Again, good choice of film as opposed to DV. For this project, film wins out, hands-down. Good job. I especially liked the shots with the girl, outside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasarsenault Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 Can you give some specs on the film? Cam, Film, Process, editing? Just curious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveb40 Posted February 27, 2005 Author Share Posted February 27, 2005 Can you give some specs on the film? Cam, Film, Process, editing? Just curious! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> thanks for the feedback! here's the technical: camera - krasnogorsk k3 filmstock - ilford hp5 b/w negative processing - cinelab in boston editing - final cut pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cohen Phillips Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 I enjoyed it and I applad you for shooting it on film. :) It look really nice. You had some really good shots in there. I also agree that your film shows promise and I would like to see more of your work. Nice short and thanks for sharing it with us. ;) Good luck in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nguyen D. Nguyen Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 Hello everyone. PLease allow some time for it to download. http://www.insomniacreations.com/bartolozz...amefilthqb.html thanks, -steve <{POST_SNAPBACK}> One thing I would recommend to you (as in, if you choose to make this type of film again) is to slow the pacing down by a lot. One of the pitfalls of making "art films" that do obscure things it that they often try to convey too much "conceptual depth" in too little time. Other than that, I also applaud that you worked with film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveb40 Posted March 11, 2005 Author Share Posted March 11, 2005 One thing I would recommend to you (as in, if you choose to make this type of film again) is to slow the pacing down by a lot. One of the pitfalls of making "art films" that do obscure things it that they often try to convey too much "conceptual depth" in too little time. Other than that, I also applaud that you worked with film. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> yes. thanks. i am always worried that everything gets too boring. and being a short i don't feel i have the time to slow down in the way i would if i was making a feature. very challenging. did you find it obscure? i feel it might be too direct. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now