Keith Tippit Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 We're purchasing a Red camera and I'm wondering about your experiences with Red Pro zoom lenses. There is a thread on the primes that got a lot of positive feedback but the jury seems to be out on the zooms. Thoughts? Since this is my first post (long-time lurker) I feel compelled to thank you all, especially David Mullen and similar posters for all the valuable information I've gleaned over the years. It's much appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Brawley Posted March 4, 2010 Premium Member Share Posted March 4, 2010 We're purchasing a Red camera and I'm wondering about your experiences with Red Pro zoom lenses. There is a thread on the primes that got a lot of positive feedback but the jury seems to be out on the zooms. Thoughts? Since this is my first post (long-time lurker) I feel compelled to thank you all, especially David Mullen and similar posters for all the valuable information I've gleaned over the years. It's much appreciated. I've tested a couple of the RED zooms, but never been able to choose them over other lenses on jobs where I've shot RED. They are really excellent value for money, but there is a difference at the top end. I'm lucky enough to work on gigs that can afford to pay the premium price, but I always found them amazingly good optically (for the price), and perhaps a little bit of a let down in the actual mechanical side of things. I think they are ideally suited to owner operators that will take good care of them. jb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Fritts Posted March 4, 2010 Share Posted March 4, 2010 I have used the 18mm-85mm a couple times, but never on any projects of substantial importance. It blooms terribly in the highlights or around bright objects. I would put your money toward an older Angineux zoom that has been taken care off. You will be much more pleased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Tippit Posted March 4, 2010 Author Share Posted March 4, 2010 Thanks for the feedback. I was hoping for a bunch of rave reviews on the zooms so I could save 10k but I think maybe the primes are the way to go. We're starting a low-budget feature at the end of the month. I can rent a good zoom for that if needed or maybe buy an older zoom as suggested. I've worked on a few shoots with the red camera and the DPs on those shoots rented a quality zoom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Adrian Sierkowski Posted March 4, 2010 Premium Member Share Posted March 4, 2010 Zooms are complicated, hence expensive, and need to be more precise than a prime lens. I mean, in essence, you're making a lot of primes in one housing and trying to keep the same amount of light traveling through no matter what, and all falling onto the same spot. Go with primes for when you've got control of filming, and a zoom for those times when you don't. That's always my feeling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charley Weston Posted March 30, 2010 Share Posted March 30, 2010 Ever since we got our RPPs we've been favoring them over our zooms, and once our 18mm arrives to complete the set, we'll probably only bring out the RED 18-50 for handheld shoots, otherwise the Primes cover everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Dom Jaeger Posted June 9, 2010 Premium Member Share Posted June 9, 2010 I've serviced a couple of RED zooms and not enjoyed the experience. They seem to be rehoused stills lenses, so optically they're not too bad (good enough for RED at least). But you'd be very lucky if you found one that held focus through a zoom, and the amount of backlash in the focus mechanism means that the scale is virtually useless. Also the entire zoom range is achieved in less than half a turn of the ring, so you've got no finesse available. Even though they're dirt cheap for a Cine lens, you really get what you pay for. If you need a zoom I'd recommend hiring an older Angenieux every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Skates Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 The 18-50mm optics are fine. They project well. The mechanical quality is really poor. That is my opinion based on 4 examples of this lens that I've projected and examined. Including one that RED sent out as a loaner while the owners lens was being serviced for many weeks. Zoom barrel action is ok. The focus barrel action was stiff and gritty on all examples. All had good contrast and sharpness. No a one held focus during the zoom. All had issues with the focus mark accuracy. These lenses are not bad when treated as a variable primes and focused by eye. With these issues is it worth the price... I've projected one example of the 18-85mm. Much better build quality than the 18-50mm. The action on the zoom and focus barrels was smooth. It had good contrast and sharpness. The example I projected had some back focus issues. Not sure if it came that way from Red or was dropped or mishandled by the owner. The two striking things about the lens is the quality of the PL mount. It seemed to be a very light grade aluminum instead of steel. The second thing was the giant front diameter 142mm???. For a lens in this focal length and physical length this is way big. A 110mm or 114mm would be more in line with other lenses in this focal range. 142mm limits you in terms of matte boxes and filter sizes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunleik Groven Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 (edited) But I guess the OP was asking about the "pro" zooms. that's the 18-85 and the new 17-50 the old 18-50 and 50-150 have serious issues. I thought the newer ones were much better, but have never had a chance to play with them... Edited July 11, 2010 by Gunleik Groven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Peterson Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 (edited) On 6/9/2010 at 6:44 PM, Dom Jaeger said: Even though they're dirt cheap for a Cine lens, you really get what you pay for. If you need a zoom I'd recommend hiring an older Angenieux every time. On 3/4/2010 at 6:41 PM, Josh Fritts said: I have used the 18mm-85mm a couple times, but never on any projects of substantial importance. It blooms terribly in the highlights or around bright objects. I would put your money toward an older Angineux zoom that has been taken care off. You will be much more pleased. Sorry for reviving an super ancient old thread, zombies! But didn't want to create a whole new thread just to ask further about people's thoughts of the RED zooms vs old Angenieux zooms of a comparable price? I thought the RED 18-85 was a monster, but next to the Angenieux 17-102 T2.9 it almost looks small! Hmmm Of course we've also got new modern competition now with the OOOM 25-100mm T2.9! Or the DZOFILM Pictor 20-55mm T2.8, but the range of that is so small, now you're looking at two zooms. Or the Tokina 25-75mm T2.9, but again, lacking a little on the wide and the tele end. Edited December 27, 2020 by David Peterson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now