Dan Hasson Posted June 11, 2022 Share Posted June 11, 2022 Hello, I'm not sure this is the right section as it seems quite an odd problem. I am having to make a copy of my 87 minute feature film to a super small file size. It is for the US Copyright Office and they won't accept anything larger than 500mb. I have managed to get a low res file down to 1.7gb but that's as far as I have taken it. I have tried compressing into a .zip (I use a MacBook) but that does not reduce the size at all. A loss of quality isn't a problem as they just need a low res one to check. Has anyone encountered this and knows a way to really reduce the size? Thanks, Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted June 11, 2022 Premium Member Share Posted June 11, 2022 I tend to use ffmpeg for jobs like this, as you have fine control over everything. If you're comfortable with command line tools, you can do very well. You probably want something like: ffmpeg -color_range 2 -i INFILE -c:v libx264 -preset medium -crf 25 -pix_fmt yuv420p -c:a aac -vbr 4 -s 1280x720 OUTFILE Adjust the crf parameter for less bitrate, higher is less. Run tests of a couple of minutes of footage to find a setting you like before committing to the lengthy job of compressing the whole thing. There's probably a friendlier front end for it you could find and use that. P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Hasson Posted June 11, 2022 Author Share Posted June 11, 2022 8 hours ago, Phil Rhodes said: I tend to use ffmpeg for jobs like this, as you have fine control over everything. If you're comfortable with command line tools, you can do very well. You probably want something like: ffmpeg -color_range 2 -i INFILE -c:v libx264 -preset medium -crf 25 -pix_fmt yuv420p -c:a aac -vbr 4 -s 1280x720 OUTFILE Adjust the crf parameter for less bitrate, higher is less. Run tests of a couple of minutes of footage to find a setting you like before committing to the lengthy job of compressing the whole thing. There's probably a friendlier front end for it you could find and use that. P Amazing, that all sounds great. I'll try that out. Thanks so much! Best, Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted June 11, 2022 Premium Member Share Posted June 11, 2022 You'll need a real encoder tool, something that can adjust frame size. 480x720 at 1.5mbps should be darn close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Hasson Posted June 12, 2022 Author Share Posted June 12, 2022 20 hours ago, Tyler Purcell said: You'll need a real encoder tool, something that can adjust frame size. 480x720 at 1.5mbps should be darn close. Hi Tyler, Do you have any suggestions for one? I don't really know what a real encoder tool is. Thanks, Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted June 12, 2022 Premium Member Share Posted June 12, 2022 Oh, umm DaVinci Resolve has a great encoder, it's free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted June 12, 2022 Premium Member Share Posted June 12, 2022 On 6/11/2022 at 8:02 PM, Dan Hasson said: Amazing, that all sounds great. I'll try that out. Thanks so much! Best, Dan I'm told this is a reasonable ffmpeg front end for Macs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted June 12, 2022 Premium Member Share Posted June 12, 2022 1 minute ago, Phil Rhodes said: I'm told this is a reasonable ffmpeg front end for Macs. Thats cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Aapo Lettinen Posted June 22, 2022 Premium Member Share Posted June 22, 2022 HandBrake works pretty OK for heavy compressions too. I would make it as low resolution as practical (for example about 400 something times 200 something pixels formats are still watchable) and the lowest audio bitrate possible (audio can take a lot of space at this small file sizes) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Aapo Lettinen Posted June 22, 2022 Premium Member Share Posted June 22, 2022 For example if the master would be fullhd 1920x1080, one could divide the horizontal and vertical by 4 to get 480x270 final resolution. Should be perfectly ok as a low resolution screener Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicolas POISSON Posted June 22, 2022 Share Posted June 22, 2022 (edited) On 6/11/2022 at 12:16 PM, Dan Hasson said: I have tried compressing into a .zip but that does not reduce the size at all. A "zip" compression is a true lossless compression. This is a rather simple and fast algorithm compared to lossy compression. Every lossy compression algorithm performs an additional "zip" type compression at the end of the process, as it has no drawbacks. Hence you will not gain anything significant trying to "zip" jpeg images or h264 video: the lossless compression has already been performed together with the lossy one. For the same reason, you will gain almost nothing zipping multiple compressed images/videos. But this is an easy way to pack them. Edited June 22, 2022 by Nicolas POISSON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Hasson Posted July 15, 2022 Author Share Posted July 15, 2022 On 6/22/2022 at 2:32 PM, aapo lettinen said: For example if the master would be fullhd 1920x1080, one could divide the horizontal and vertical by 4 to get 480x270 final resolution. Should be perfectly ok as a low resolution screener Thanks for this information. Sorry it has taken this long to get back! Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Hasson Posted July 15, 2022 Author Share Posted July 15, 2022 On 6/22/2022 at 3:14 PM, Nicolas POISSON said: A "zip" compression is a true lossless compression. This is a rather simple and fast algorithm compared to lossy compression. Every lossy compression algorithm performs an additional "zip" type compression at the end of the process, as it has no drawbacks. Hence you will not gain anything significant trying to "zip" jpeg images or h264 video: the lossless compression has already been performed together with the lossy one. For the same reason, you will gain almost nothing zipping multiple compressed images/videos. But this is an easy way to pack them. Very useful information. Thank you for that. Sorry for taking this long to get back. Thanks, Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now