Jump to content

John Holland

Basic Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,298

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by John Holland

  1. John Holland
    Happy Christmas to everyone . 2016 has to be the worst year ever !! . Just a bit worried what 2017 will bring us .
  2. John Holland
    Look at Roger Deakins website where he says he did not use the 65 !
  3. John Holland
    You really can't belive all you read on IMDB !
  4. John Holland
    Not shot on Alex 65 . Alexa XT studio and other standard Alexa cameras.
  5. John Holland
    Tyler the answer your question to the 6 min clip from "Dunkirk " is it was a 70mm 15/70 Imax print in the correct format that filled the whole Imax screen unlike Rogue One although 70mm film print did not fill the whole screen and I think it was about 1.90 format . This could be because of it was shot in Ultra Panavision70 a ultra wide format and would have lost to much if gone to the correct Imax format .
  6. John Holland
    Tyler I don,t think we could have seen the same film ! I watched a Imax 70mm film print I loved the cinematography and was amazed by the lovely amount of print stock grain on view . The sound mix was fine and worked very well with the visuals . As a movie I really enjoyed it although it could have been a touch shorter .
  7. John Holland
    You should make the effort to see this Phil as Robin says a great film .
  8. John Holland
    "Goliath" fantastic performance from Billy Bob Thornton and William Hurt .
  9. John Holland
    No "Dunkirk " was processed in L.A by Fotokem. Kodak/ iDailies not a 65mm lab.
  10. John Holland
    No "Dunkirk" was processed in L.A by Fotokem. Kodak/iDailies not a 65mm lab.
  11. John Holland
    Cinelab London doing tests on their new 65mm processing equipment today water tests today then chemicals tomorrow . Looking good first 65mm processing in UK for donkeys years .
  12. John Holland
    Trying to remember as not seen the film since it's first release . It would have been an optical effect i.e done with an optical printer !
  13. John Holland
    For some reason Peter is no longer a BSC member.
  14. John Holland
    Google it on your phone !
  15. John Holland
    Not seen this here . It seems to me on these Pilot shows in the states they get a "A" list DoP to shoot it then if it is taken up someone not so well known will shoot the series . Am I correct ?
  16. John Holland
    Arri 65 is not an IMAX camera it has the about the same format as Super Panavision 70 / Todd AO . And that format is a long way removed from the original Imax format . Its all a big marketing lie .
  17. John Holland
    The Brute Carbon arc 225 amps needed a DC genny to work .It was the best big lamp ever ! The closest thing now is a 18k HMi , but is crap it's compared to out put of Brute . It was a cost thing your needed a spark looking after it most of the time triming the two arcs . Miss them big time .
  18. John Holland
    Are there any film labs left in Australia ?
  19. John Holland
    David Watkin did this 40/50 years ago bounced and in front of Brute Arcs.
  20. John Holland
    Sky shame owned by Murdoch would not have any of his poop TV channels or news print comics called newspapers in this household ! Shame sold to a turd !
  21. John Holland
    I really like the "look" you have produced there .
  22. John Holland
    Anyway back to the topic a DoP should be paid for the grading he/she may have spent weeks or months shooting and the Director must support this practice . Producers will always fight it .
  23. John Holland
    I don't know no problems with the two labs here in London plus Alpha one mobile lab.
  24. John Holland
    The original plan was to shoot film but only weeks before start of production switched to Alexa . At least it is Panavision anamorphic !
  25. John Holland
    I would go with the balloon light and maybe use something smaller as back light .
×
×
  • Create New...