Jose luis villar Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Here is another fashion shot with 50d Vision 3. The telecine was done by Ochoypico, the camera used my Beaulieu 4008 ZM2. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zac Fettig Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Beautiful! It looks amazing! Very clean picture. Makes me want to go out and shoot some 50D! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Maliwanag Posted January 21, 2014 Share Posted January 21, 2014 Looks fantastic! What a great scan. I'm very surprised by the clean image! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Cunningham Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Jose, that;s amazing! How are you getting this so grain free!? Are you using Neat Video to reduce the grain? Your lighting and colorist (I assume you) are fantastic! Can you tell me the secret? I'm having a very difficult time with coloring my flat scans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriele Turchi Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 very impressive indeed . could be mistaken for 16mm . i am curious about what scanner has been used thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose luis villar Posted January 22, 2014 Author Share Posted January 22, 2014 Hi David, the color correction is very simple, is made with rgb curves in Premiere Pro, Neat application is minimal, I do not like to clean much grain because it creates an image plastic video.Look at these screenshots, Gabriele, the telecine is done in http://ochoypico.com/super8-telecine/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Stevens Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 No doubt that looked like 16mm. 50D is wonderful stock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Cunningham Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Jose, Thanks for the tips! I'm going to try re-coloring my shots later tonight with your technique. It looks simple and efficient! I also have Neat, so I'll be adding that in too! Thanks again! Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Schilling Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Wow, that looks good! I like the Neat noise settings you used, so thanks for sharing. The more i see and work with negatives S8, the less i miss reversal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Will Montgomery Posted January 22, 2014 Premium Member Share Posted January 22, 2014 I believe that model makes the film look good or is it the other way around? :) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Sponsor Robert Houllahan Posted January 23, 2014 Site Sponsor Share Posted January 23, 2014 Nice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Cunningham Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Yeah, models definitely help. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Bill DiPietra Posted January 23, 2014 Premium Member Share Posted January 23, 2014 Yup, that fooled me! Thought that was 16mm. 50D has always been my favorite color stock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Marti Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Amazing stuff... as always! ;) Enhorabuena, José Luís! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriele Turchi Posted January 24, 2014 Share Posted January 24, 2014 very interesting ... the quality of the transfer seems very good , even tough from the specs seems to be a telecine and not even a data scanner ... nonetheless beautiful . I guess that the quality of the Beaulieu is an important factor too ... i just shot some Vision 3 200T but i have not seen it yet because i was trying to get Pro8mm (considering that i got Film + processing + scan package ) to scan in LOG but they ended up saying that they cannot do it in LOG ... so i guess i have to look somewhere else ... ps: was your telecine in HD , would you mind share just a couple of HD frames ? how did you get it back ? DPX or Qt? thanks g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Parsons Posted January 24, 2014 Share Posted January 24, 2014 ...i just shot some Vision 3 200T but i have not seen it yet because i was trying to get Pro8mm (considering that i got Film + processing + scan package ) to scan in LOG but they ended up saying that they cannot do it in LOG ... so i guess i have to look somewhere else ... Technically, an uncorrected film negative is something of a log image. It still has a slight contrast curve to it, but its still flatter than rec709 or if you made a projecting print. You'll never get a flat curve from film like that of a digital camera. You don't need to. Film generally has a higher dynamic range than digital to begin with and still preserves highlights better than most of todays digital cameras. If you still really wanted it, the only way you're going to get a LOG looking image is if you use a DI film. Thanks for reminding me about this stock. I have a roll of it in 35mm staring at me every time I open the fridge. I never thought to consider it for super-8. The grain holds up extremely well!. That is one sharp piece of glass! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Donoghue Posted January 24, 2014 Share Posted January 24, 2014 Beautiful transfer. I've yet to try 50D now I really must buy a few rolls.I'm always put off by the scan costs. It would be really interesting to see a scan of 50D going through the new super8 film camera being worked on when it comes out. I know unsteadiness is a quirk of super8 but if this stock went through that camera with it's proper film feed it would effectively be 16mm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose luis villar Posted January 24, 2014 Author Share Posted January 24, 2014 Here the mk-of, shot on Ektachrome 100d and Tri-X, with Canon 1014 xls and 514 xl. This really seems super 8. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Cunningham Posted January 24, 2014 Share Posted January 24, 2014 <sigh> The loss of E100D is so depressing. :( 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ignacio benedeti Posted January 24, 2014 Share Posted January 24, 2014 Dear JL: a beautiful film stock for a very pretty girls! Nice telecine and postproduction, too. A pleasure to watch. Congratulations! CINEcerely, Ignacio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prashantt Rai Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Superb work. the smallest of the format, smaller than your thumbnails; and it holds the sun brilliantly in the frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Jeremy Cavanagh Posted January 25, 2014 Premium Member Share Posted January 25, 2014 JL, Both the 50D and mk-of look extremely good and the mk-of showed a lot of work went into the shoot. I'm assuming this is a client commission and if so I'm curious as to how you persuaded the client to let you shoot in Super 8 rather than 16 or digital or even 35? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igor Calsina Posted January 25, 2014 Share Posted January 25, 2014 Hello, Excellent work! Great scan! :) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose luis villar Posted January 25, 2014 Author Share Posted January 25, 2014 Hi Jeremy, This is a good question, sorry for my English I'll try to explain, I have a Phaseone, that costs more than a Red, the reason that I shot in s8 is only because I think s8 good scan is the best way that people who do not understand film or digital, and see a difference today in the West is all vintage fashion.For my shoot s16 or s8 is the same for costs in a production like this, I prefer the portability and customer s8, s8 or Alexa gives you the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now