
Jon O'Brien
Basic Member-
Posts
1,725 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Jon O'Brien
-
Audiodopes first Analog Musicvideo
Jon O'Brien replied to Randy J Tomlinson's topic in General Discussion
Looks great, Randy! I think film gives music videos a gritty, earthy, artistic edge. I expect that real film music videos will become more sought after by clients in coming years as the difference in quality/look is noticeable - even on youtube. It's just a great look. What's not to love about it?- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Disastrous figures for low budget UK films
Jon O'Brien replied to David Mawson's topic in General Discussion
Thank you. A script I think I will write. Degrees of Geniality being the working title. Could even make it to the release. If someone can give me a good name of a UK director or producer I will approach them when I've completed the final draft. -
Aerial Cinematography Reel Australia
Jon O'Brien replied to Chris Tangey's topic in Jobs, Resumes, and Reels
Great footage! Love it. Made me think that there's still a place left in filmmaking for helicopter shots, though much more expensive. Like the opening shot of We of the Never Never which I've always loved (combined with that soundtrack score) - a very fast shot that I don't think a drone could ever do. I've been aware of your work before Chris, through a friend of mine Mark Harwood. Beautiful colours around Alice Springs.- 5 replies
-
- drone aerial
- cinematography
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ahh, film. A delight. Adorable.
-
The OP might like to learn about drones. Was talking to a pro video-maker yesterday and he does just about all his shooting with them. He showed me a film he made, and all the shots, interior or exterior, even with anything like an 'old-fashioned' dolly shot, was done with a camera on a tiny drone. He mentioned the Red cameras and described them as being too heavy. His video looked slick and professional but I found it uninteresting ... to me it looked, well, too slick and professional. I much prefer the wobbly dolly shots in the old black & white film camera images one sees in, for instance, Random Harvest (1942). Of course, to each his own.
-
How about asking Les Bosher in South Wales? He might be able to help. http://www.lesbosher.co.uk/
-
Thus, the large number of women in orchestras today (to take an example in the arts). They marry men who can support them. They wait until they find a good doctor, solicitor, mining engineer,or tenured academic to marry - someone who just doesn't play at all (may be talented and interested but hasn't got the time). And it works out well. For men who are creative it can be a bit more difficult, but with patience things can work out. Or is my thinking wrong on this? It's just I've noticed a thing or two, in the arts.
-
Help me pick a camera?
Jon O'Brien replied to Sam Petty's topic in Students, New Filmmakers, Film Schools and Programs
In my opinion there's something in that idea of starting out with a camera that actually looks like something a cinematographer/DP 'should' have stuck in front of their eye. Look can be important. My dad told me that once, when starting out on a job/ in a career. At least look the part, and go from there. It gives people confidence in you, or it can get the ball rolling at least. Filmmakers/cinematographers with SLR-looking things, no matter what whizz-bang gimbal thing etc they've got with it, still look like still photographers in my opinion. Yes, a small point to make, but worth thinking over. I'd get something that does the job superlatively, is affordable - so think mostly of lenses, will pay itself back soon so you can upgrade, and also looks like something associated with filming/videoing. Eg. a video camera that looks like one, not a DSLR. -
Should a video be called a film?
Jon O'Brien replied to Daniel D. Teoli Jr.'s topic in General Discussion
Interesting. But "shooting" is also used for a film shoot. -
Difference between s16 Blow Up to 35 and native 35
Jon O'Brien replied to chauncey alan's topic in General Discussion
Check out First Man (2018), S16 intercut with mostly 2 and 3 perf 35mm. I saw it on the big screen (digital) and it all looked fantastic. I've also got it on Blu Ray. The first part of the movie is S16. Looked just slightly grainy but great in the theatre. The rest of the movie is mostly 2 perf 35mm. The S16 was particularly good for the cockpit shots and when they filmed in the command module/LEM. Walking on the moon set was shot in 65mm. But if you mean making 35mm prints, super 16 might be quite grainy. Then again, it's certainly been done with success. Modern audiences, accustomed to crystal clear digital imagery, might take a while to acclimatize to it. -
Should a video be called a film?
Jon O'Brien replied to Daniel D. Teoli Jr.'s topic in General Discussion
I think it's fine to say "I'm doing some filming" when shooting scenes with a digital camera. Sounds so much better than "I'm videoing". What a mouthful. But you won't escape the reality that you're not shooting real celluloid. Not that many care a fig for that. I do. -
Your "path" to becoming a Cinematographer
Jon O'Brien replied to Joseph Tese's topic in Cinematographers
I'm not in the film industry, but am having a talk with someone soon that might lead to something. But my inclination, and plan, is to get close to that camera and stick by it. The electrical/gaffer idea is excellent, and would likely lead to excellence too, but just on a sheer 'opportunities that may arise' factor I'd get next to that camera and stay there. You can always learn more about lighting, a hugely important thing, as you become more involved with the camera. That's my thoughts on it anyway. -
It really always depends on context I think. And as Bruce said, keep it in reserve and then it will be more powerful. Also, sometimes less is much more. In Deliverance (1972), when the cars first pull up at the isolated community to get directions and fill up, close to the start of the film, the camera does a subtle forward dolly shot towards the cars as they pull up directly towards camera. I don't know why the cinematographer did that, it wasn't an obvious move (to me), but it has a subtle charm to it. It just looks good. But you hardly notice it. Put a few subtle moves like that into a picture and it can be a big thing in my opinion. I can't even say though what the psychological effect of such shots is. Just slightly upping the coolness factor?
-
Is it really cheaper to shoot in digital ?
Jon O'Brien replied to panagiotis agapitou's topic in General Discussion
Is it cheaper, digital? Anyway, think of a pair of shoes. What's best, a cheaper pair, or a more expensive pair. Think about that a moment. It's deep. -
Is it really cheaper to shoot in digital ?
Jon O'Brien replied to panagiotis agapitou's topic in General Discussion
But let's make it 3 years ? -
Is it really cheaper to shoot in digital ?
Jon O'Brien replied to panagiotis agapitou's topic in General Discussion
You know those tiny little pre-fab garden sheds, designed to keep a mower in, some tools, and maybe a small workbench underneath the window for a guy to get away from the house for a bit and while away some time on a project/hobby? I will never forget the day I arrived at the end of a long and bumpy dirt track out in the countryside, and there in one of these tiny sheds were two enormous Victoria 8 35mm/70mm film projectors, patiently waiting for their chance to rattle into life once more ... They were shown to me by an aging projectionist, quite famous in the area. -
Is it really cheaper to shoot in digital ?
Jon O'Brien replied to panagiotis agapitou's topic in General Discussion
I still wonder occasionally if there will be an eventual return of the film projector in a lot of cinemas. You know, not to replace digital projection (which in my opinion is fine for showing film-shot movies on), but to provide a bit of variety for that section of humanity that cares to see films shown on, er, film. -
16mm Vision3 250D + 500T footage stills attached
Jon O'Brien replied to Stephen Perera's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
Just beautiful pictures. Film is perfect for this particular project. Very inspiring to see. -
My new cosplay documentary being shot on film
Jon O'Brien replied to Tyler Purcell's topic in General Discussion
It's going to be a very positive film that will inspire a lot of people. Well done so far and best wishes with it. -
How many films / videos have you made?
Jon O'Brien replied to Daniel D. Teoli Jr.'s topic in General Discussion
All up, about 40 individual films I would say, perhaps more, all shot on Super 8 (up to half hour long), 8mm (50 ft reels only), and 16mm (short films only) so far. I funded nearly all of them (except the ones I did at school in Film & TV) and was cinematographer for the lot. Shooting 2 perf for next projects. -
Storing exposed film in the fridge
Jon O'Brien replied to Kaspar Kamu's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
The fridge is a fairly damp place. When you say fridge do you mean the one in the kitchen, or a special fridge set aside for storing film? Sometimes I wonder if dampness could cause problems. I've got film in the kitchen fridge. -
Great to hear! Long live film!
-
It's an interesting topic actually and extremely relevant to filmmaking, which of course deals in 'look', or image, as well as other things (like sound and editing). I have ideas on what clothes look good for certain characters, dependent on story. The whole look of a picture is important. Usually the Art Director/Costume designer figures this all out. But in low budget independent pictures I've got definite ideas for what would look best to tell that particular story, whatever it was. Some things are more photogenic, or simply 'work' better for that film or that scene within a film. It's like mood. Filmmaking is really to a large extent a form of entertainment and a big part of that is telling a story with image.
-
Is it really cheaper to shoot in digital ?
Jon O'Brien replied to panagiotis agapitou's topic in General Discussion
As to whether film stock has degraded in quality, have a look at 'Far from the Madding Crowd' (2015) and you will see it's definitely just as good as it ever was. It was all shot completely on 35mm film.