Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Premium Member
Posted

Not trying to throw a spanner in the works, but from what I understand Cinelab in London does not develop Fuji stock any more... Which sucks as I have 15x rolls of s16mm 250D in my fridge!

  • Premium Member
Posted
2 hours ago, Marcel Zyskind said:

Not trying to throw a spanner in the works, but from what I understand Cinelab in London does not develop Fuji stock any more... Which sucks as I have 15x rolls of s16mm 250D in my fridge!

Actually, it's becoming a real problem. I've had nothing but issues getting the remjet to come off of Fuji stock. Sometimes it comes off ok in the machine other times it leaves speckles on the film after processing. I sold ALL of my Fuji stock as a consequence. However, 64D is such a unique/unusual stock that I've been collecting again in order to shoot a short with it and just "risk it".  

  • Upvote 1
  • Premium Member
Posted
7 hours ago, James Compton said:

The processing issue may be lab dependant. 2 weeks ago, I processed FUJI 160T VIVID 35mm at Kodak Lab Atlanta with no issues. 

You also may not see the speckles on 35mm as much. They are very faint on 16mm. 

Posted

Hello.
I'm gonna add my experience to this, here in France, no more Fuji can be processed since two years now. 
Beware when you shoot tests on the first 100ft of a 400ft roll, the remjet in that part of the roll will sometimes not be a problem, but the problem occurs later on the roll, the closer you get to the core and the highest chance you will have remjet problems.

We have done tones of tests in our lab here since we had feature films productions buying big stocks of Fuji for cheap. Best result was by pushing temperature in the baths at one point that the gelatin of the film became very fragile. In that case, all the remjet went off. But that is playing with fire when you are handling the footage of a proper production, so please no Fuji, I know that's sad, but its like that ...

PA

Posted

It's a very interesting issue. I guess it is related to the age of film? Or storage?

I bought an assortment of 16mm Fuji stock when they ceased production. I have stored the film in freezer since then and everything has turned out just fine. Those films have been processed by Video & Film Solutions in 2014, Andec, one Italian lab and most recently - just last Autumn - by Color by DeJonghe.

Granted, hearing of these issues makes me want to try to use them ASAP and in less critical projects. Fortunately I only have 400ft of 64D and 400ft of 400T left - and one random can of F-250T (in addition to a can of Agfa XT 125, but those last two mentioned are real vintage stocks, not to be used for anything even remotely critical!)

  • Premium Member
Posted
3 hours ago, Paul-Anthony said:

I'm gonna add my experience to this, here in France, no more Fuji can be processed since two years now. 
Beware when you shoot tests on the first 100ft of a 400ft roll, the remjet in that part of the roll will sometimes not be a problem, but the problem occurs later on the roll, the closer you get to the core and the highest chance you will have remjet problems.

 

Exactly, its always at the tail of the film. I actually made a video all about this that I will be publishing soon. 

My film had been frozen from day one so I know it was not the film going bad or something like that. 

  • Premium Member
Posted
2 hours ago, Heikki Repo said:

I have stored the film in freezer since then and everything has turned out just fine.

Ya may not notice the issue. It took me a while of watching the same clip over and over again to see it. Wasn't even visible on the print I made. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Tyler Purcell said:

Ya may not notice the issue. It took me a while of watching the same clip over and over again to see it. Wasn't even visible on the print I made. 

Sounds plausible. Anyway, if I'm shooting film that is at least 8 years old, I don't really expect the outcome to be perfect.

  • Upvote 1
  • Premium Member
Posted
8 hours ago, Heikki Repo said:

Sounds plausible. Anyway, if I'm shooting film that is at least 8 years old, I don't really expect the outcome to be perfect.

Yep, it’s hard to identify emulsion issues vs other issues with old film sometimes. I shoot lots of old stock and honestly, I’ve had mixed results. Most of the time if it’s been stored well, it comes out good enough. If it’s not been stored well, it’s generally trash. 

  • 1 year later...
  • Premium Member
Posted
11 hours ago, Jaehyun Kim said:

Hi!

Is the film kept in the freezer?

How many films do you have?

Check the original posting date, this is from 2 years ago. I doubt he has anything left. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Gautam Valluri said:

I have some rolls of 8651 Fuji Super-F 250T if anyone's interested?

Hello Please tell me the storage status Was it refrigerated? I'll buy everything if it's in good condition

  • 4 months later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hi all,

Not to piggyback off of Rick’s thread but if he’s all out I have some rolls of Fuji material in 35mm that I’d be willing to part with. Please PM me for me info.

Best,

Christian

  • Site Sponsor
Posted
5 hours ago, Alexander Clemens said:

Hi Rick

I dont suppose you've got any of that Fuji F64D 35mm left?

Cheers,

Alex Clemens

Hi Alex,

No that has all been sold.

Best,

Rick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...