Jump to content

Bruce Greene

Basic Member
  • Posts

    1036
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bruce Greene

  1. You’ve been misinformed. For best options in color grading, correctly balance the color exposure in camera by using the 85 filter. Or use daylight balanced film. If you don’t use the filter, when you remove blue from the skin tones, your shadows are going to turn orange due to under exposure of the orange range of colors. Neutralizing the shadows will result in noisy shadows, or you’ll need to crush them to black. To give yourself a fighting chance at a normal color correction when shooting without the filter, increase your exposure by exposing at ISO 250 or 200.
  2. Use the orange 85 filter on your camera when shooting daylight. If for some reason you won’t, over expose by one stop to allow not under exposing non-blue light.
  3. This has got me thinking that optical/chemical printing of both motion picture and still films has become a very niche workflow. Maybe it’s time to retire the orange mask? For still photographers it would make scanning negatives with a camera much easier and perhaps lead to increased film sales? Just thinking out loud …
  4. My last confetti scene was shot in daylight, in the shade of buildings. To make the confetti sparkle I used my biggest lamp, an 18k HMI to backlight (or as close to backlight as I could without the lamp being in frame). To make the confetti sparkle, high contrast if your friend, so a hard light from the side or back looks best. You can see the effect here at about 2:50 into this clip
  5. 2.39:1… well I’ve shot a bunch of films for the theatrical market in the former USSR. The distributors there strongly prefer scope format, so I’ve shot quite a bit of it. 🙂 Im not sure I really “like it”, just what’s required. Most of my still photography is close to 1.85/1 format. Probably because it’s close to the native format of the camera! I have very very few photographs in portrait mode though…
  6. A fun project to be sure! But, it will not teach you to shoot movies I’m afraid. Please let us know if you have an exhibition of your photographs. I’d love to see them!!!
  7. In the film days… I had custom correction lenses made to fit in the Arri and Panavision eye pieces. These days, I just wear my glasses if I must, but since the focus pullers have a better view than I, I rely on them to confirm focus and operate without glasses. Almost always I can tell when a focus error is made from the sound of the focus motor not matching the action. For you, just measure the common eyepieces that you use and have a custom lens or lenses made. Mark the lens with a sharpie on the edge so that you insert it with the correct orientation.
  8. Blanks look different than real bullets. But, dummy bullets, that are sometimes used in revolver chambers when seen in the shot, look like real bullets. it’s possible that it was assumed that dummy bullets were loaded in the weapon, making it a “cold gun”… when in reality they were real bullets which should never be present anywhere on a film set. The “reports” that the prop weapons were used for target shooting when not filming are shocking, if true.
  9. It will be easiest to sync using 25fps, especially shooting the CRT displays. For some distribution, you’ll need to slow the playback to 24fps, which I’ve done in the past. It is possible that you’ll come across some LED lighting or computer screened that don’t sync well and you’ll need to experiment with shutter angles for the best result.
  10. The original Ziess high speed primes had a 3 blade iris. The triangular “bokeh” was always visible on film….
  11. Less noisy image than VHS and much tougher hardware which was better for editing…
  12. If you’re going to see the windows in frame, you will probably need to light them all. This will require the rigging to get the lamps up to window height. It’s a big space. At the very minimum, I’d use 9 1.8k open face HMI lamps. But, you might need bigger lamps, especially if you diffuse the light. I’ve done a slightly smaller room and used at least 6 18k lamps and 4 scissor lifts. Not cheap! if you can keep the windows out of frame, light from the top of the bleachers. it’s the courtroom scene in this video clip.
  13. Seems like the camera was set to 23.98… If all your footage is 23.98, just leave it and edit in 23.98fps. if you have other cameras at 24fps, you’ll need to assign 24fps to the Alexa footage. You may need to adjust the audio as you’ll drift sync every 501 frames I think.
  14. Great news! You already have a cinema camera in your phone. You'll need to find your own career path through the business, but you also need to learn cinema vs still photography. Write some short scripts, without dialog, and find a way to shoot and edit them. You need to learn how images combine to tell a narrative story. You need to learn where to place the camera to tell the story. If you find this idea daunting, and hard to imagine, then… cinematography might not be for you. This will cost you nothing but time and energy so get started … today!
  15. You can use a mouse, but the control will be coarse. Much finer adjustment is possible with a control panel. For serious work, the control panel is almost required for this reason.
  16. I have tried using the “auto” transform from a card in Resolve. Sometimes it works, other times, strange result and I don’t know why. If you are successful, place this transform node in the middle of your node tree. You will find, I think, that this correction node, while accurate, may clip highlights and shadows. To fix this, use the nodes before the transform to bring back missing highlights or shadows using the lift or gain controls. Its possible your log to 709 LUT may do a better job if it was created for your particular camera. But the same technique applies. Use nodes before the LUT transform to adjust highlights and shadows. I think you will find it very difficult to simply normalize this chart log image by simple color correction adjustments. But, give it a try as you will learn a bit!
  17. From my experience... From my last film original... Film was processed and an "off line" scan or telecine was made for editorial. After picture lock, the takes used were scanned and conformed to the edit. Color grading was done using a 2383 simulation LUT and a negative was output and the prints made. They looked pretty close to the DI simulation. DI was done at Deluxe if I recall. Not sure what happened with the video masters though. Sony wouldn't give me a copy, and it was a foreign film, so there were not any to buy in the US. I had asked that they output the video through the emulation LUT, but I'm not sure Sony followed through with that...
  18. If you can’t afford to shoot film, I doubt you can afford the 10’s of thousands of dollars to film out a negative, scan it, and then re-color correct the result. I’ve only done film outs for a film release, but never rescanned the film negative. But, if there will be no film release, I would grade the digital movie and output a low contrast log version for creating the film neg, just so you don’t throw away data that you might need to digitally color correct your new film negative. I would certainly run multiple tests of short clips before committing to the work flow. Good luck with this and please share your results if you ever do it.
  19. If you want to see the reflections, you’ll need to light the interior bright enough to see through them, and this may look unnatural. Otherwise, you’ll need to flag off the reflections from the glass. Use a black flag rather than a a diffuser, otherwise you’ll just see a reflection of the diffusion. The flag will need to be pretty big too to avoid seeing reflections of the frame. And it will get dark inside, so you’ll need to light the interior as well usually. Be prepared to spend some time rigging the flag as it’s the most difficult part of the set up. Lately, I’ve had producers insisting on shooting these scenes using chroma key to save time and money and this generally works well, but you’ll need to shoot the BG plates as well. Reflections in the glass are then added in post, so shoot those plates as well.
  20. I believe this describes an older, video style Varicam. FilmRec mode allowed a choice of 4 or 5 different gamma corrections, based upon a gamma 2.2 base. The choices for gamma were given in percentages. 200% through 500 or 600%. The highest number recorded the entire dynamic range of the camera, but not in a log curve. Adding a correction curve during color grading was done to create the look and contrast desired. As it’s not a log recording, 10 bit or higher recording was necessary to avoid banding on color corrected footage. When these cameras were current, they recorded the highest dynamic range of the early digital cinema cameras.
  21. I don’t know the Venice camera, but is it possible that it does multiple sensor read outs to extend dynamic range? if so, it could create this effect, which in most circumstances is not noticeable. This might be a question for the Sony engineers.
  22. A 4x4x4 cube, lifted up high for a night exterior is a fairly hard light source as its small relative to the distances involved. The advantage over a fresnel or other “hard” light source is that the light gently falls off to blackness vs. a focused light that is evenly lit until... it goes to black. ive used balloon lights, that look big on the ground, but once up high and far away create a fairly hard light, with gentle fall off that can look quite natural.
  23. There is... no "secret sauce". Well, except that production design, wardrobe, and movie star good looks make photography look much much better! So, assuming equally good cinematography... these days anyone can color grade a movie at home to look as good as many expensive post houses can produce. There are a few superb colorists out there, a whole bunch of competent ones, and ... lots of guys who know the knobs, but not photography. I'm a cinematographer who has color corrected some of the films I've photographed, at home. So, call me a "semi-pro" colorist 🙂 I'm using Davinci Resolve, an Eizo display I've calibrated myself, and a few thousand dollars worth of computer stuff. If you're interested in what can be done at home, here are some clips of the last theatrical picture I color corrected in my house... It's a "lowish budget" movie, shot on location without a major Hollywood production design, though we did our best!
×
×
  • Create New...