Samuel Berger Posted September 12, 2024 Posted September 12, 2024 Hey guys, due to the enormous price decrease, I've been thinking of finally getting a Sony F55 instead of the FX6. Do you guys have any experience with that camera? It seems a lot more impressive than the FX6 as long as I buy the AXS-R5 external recorder. @Tyler Purcell knows I avoided the FS7 like the plague back in the day (I'm a Canon shooter) but the F55 is something else.
Chris Burke Posted September 12, 2024 Posted September 12, 2024 Go for it. Some cameras come with a ProRes option. I agree, having the raw recorder if you want it is a great option.
Max Field Posted September 12, 2024 Posted September 12, 2024 If you need a camera for some ENG capture style stuff, or you need to do films with a global shutter then I'd say a price point of around $2,000 for a shoot-ready F55 is a solid deal. Woody Allen used it for a few films and those pictures looked good enough to me. If those above features are not something important to you then Blackmagic Pocket 6K is far more the way to go. As it will cost almost half the price of the F55 with cheaper accessories across the board. For some odd reason there is a bubble of around $1,500 that high end digital cine cameras never drop below no matter how ancient they get. 1
Samuel Berger Posted September 12, 2024 Author Posted September 12, 2024 13 minutes ago, Max Field said: If you need a camera for some ENG capture style stuff, or you need to do films with a global shutter then I'd say a price point of around $2,000 for a shoot-ready F55 is a solid deal. Woody Allen used it for a few films and those pictures looked good enough to me. If those above features are not something important to you then Blackmagic Pocket 6K is far more the way to go. As it will cost almost half the price of the F55 with cheaper accessories across the board. For some odd reason there is a bubble of around $1,500 that high end digital cine cameras never drop below no matter how ancient they get. Thanks Max, also, can't wait to tell my teen that the creator of CLASS OF '09 talked to me today, it's all the rage with the kiddos, haha! I think Jeffrey is hilarious! 1
Samuel Berger Posted September 13, 2024 Author Posted September 13, 2024 On 9/12/2024 at 9:39 AM, Max Field said: I'd say a price point of around $2,000 for a shoot-ready F55 is a solid deal. I found a guy selling one with the ProRes upgrade for $2k. What do you think? The ProRes board alone used to cost $2k by itself! @Tyler Purcell what do you think?
Samuel Berger Posted September 13, 2024 Author Posted September 13, 2024 I ordered it, it was just the right thing to do. Now to find a way of mounting an E mount lens on a FZ mount!
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted September 13, 2024 Premium Member Posted September 13, 2024 1 hour ago, Samuel Berger said: I found a guy selling one with the ProRes upgrade for $2k. What do you think? The ProRes board alone used to cost $2k by itself! @Tyler Purcell what do you think? Oooo not bad! Go for it. Cheap! 1
Samuel Berger Posted September 13, 2024 Author Posted September 13, 2024 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Tyler Purcell said: Oooo not bad! Go for it. Cheap! Thanks! Hopefully this thread will help people making the same journey! Mine will come with a Gold Mount plate. I never owned one before. I wonder why the owners didn't just go with V-mount. I also wish there was a SxS-to-SSD solution, but I doubt that's ever going to be a thing. Edit: I just found out there are adapters that allow you to use SD cards in SxS slots, but, I have yet to see confirmation that it will work with the F55. Edited September 13, 2024 by Samuel Berger
Premium Member Daniel J. Fox Posted September 14, 2024 Premium Member Posted September 14, 2024 22 hours ago, Samuel Berger said: I ordered it, it was just the right thing to do. Now to find a way of mounting an E mount lens on a FZ mount! You can't mount Sony E-mount lenses to FZ due to the flange distance. There are however adapters out there for almost every vintage lens type and even LPL.
Samuel Berger Posted September 14, 2024 Author Posted September 14, 2024 4 minutes ago, Daniel J. Fox said: You can't mount Sony E-mount lenses to FZ due to the flange distance. There are however adapters out there for almost every vintage lens type and even LPL. This is incorrect, I see Fujinon E-mount zooms on F55s all the time.
Balz Auf der Maur Posted September 14, 2024 Posted September 14, 2024 No, Daniel is right, it‘s not possible (source: owned an FZ mount camera myself up until recently). There is however an option to change the Fujinon Zooms (i assume you‘re thinking about the Fuji MK-E Zooms 18-55 & 50-135?) to an FZ mount, which is probably what you‘ve seen being used 😉 here‘s a linkt to mtf: https://www.lensadaptor.com/fuji-mk-lens-sony-fz-mount
Premium Member Daniel J. Fox Posted September 14, 2024 Premium Member Posted September 14, 2024 1 hour ago, Samuel Berger said: This is incorrect, I see Fujinon E-mount zooms on F55s all the time. I own an F55 and two F3s - I know these cameras back to front when it comes to lens options and what adapters can be used with the FZ mount. You can "change" the mount to E-mount on the Fujinon zoom to FZ (I've 4 of the lenses in my store and an FZ mount kit), but you can't use an adapter, it's a full mount replacement. If you want an MK 18-55 I could mod you one to FZ and give you a decent price 🙂
Samuel Berger Posted September 14, 2024 Author Posted September 14, 2024 3 minutes ago, Daniel J. Fox said: I own an F55 and two F3s - I know these cameras back to front when it comes to lens options and what adapters can be used with the FZ mount. You can "change" the mount to E-mount on the Fujinon zoom to FZ (I've 4 of the lenses in my store and an FZ mount kit), but you can't use an adapter, it's a full mount replacement. If you want an MK 18-55 I could mod you one to FZ and give you a decent price 🙂 Thank you for the clarification, yes you do have to unscrew the flange and remount. It's not like a Metabones thing, I guess. Sure, DM me what you have in mind for that zoom. Are you leaving the F55 environment?
Premium Member Daniel J. Fox Posted September 14, 2024 Premium Member Posted September 14, 2024 Just now, Samuel Berger said: Thank you for the clarification, yes you do have to unscrew the flange and remount. It's not like a Metabones thing, I guess. Sure, DM me what you have in mind for that zoom. Are you leaving the F55 environment? No - the F3 and the F55 are the backbone of our camera kit and have been for a couple of years now and no plans to change that any time soon. I'll DM you re: the MK 18-55 - I have two basically new in box.
Samuel Berger Posted September 14, 2024 Author Posted September 14, 2024 12 minutes ago, Daniel J. Fox said: No - the F3 and the F55 are the backbone of our camera kit and have been for a couple of years now and no plans to change that any time soon. I'll DM you re: the MK 18-55 - I have two basically new in box. That sounds great, do you work in ProRes or 4K XAVC 480? I can't wait to try my new camera out. I don't think I'll be doing the RAW because it requires buying the $600 add-on (AXS-R5).
Premium Member Daniel J. Fox Posted September 14, 2024 Premium Member Posted September 14, 2024 My camera has the ProRes cards which are useful. I intend to get the R5 or F7 for very high-end work, but I need to pay off a few other bills first 😉 1
Samuel Berger Posted September 17, 2024 Author Posted September 17, 2024 Greeting, future readers. The issue with the F55 shooting RAW, for anyone Googling this years from now, is that it requires the AXS-R1 add-on. The add-on itself isn't that expensive. The real problem begins when you need to feed it AXSM cards. The cards are still used (I think on the Venice?) so their price has not come down at all. The AXSM-512S24 is around $200 used. The current model sells new for $2500. These are both 512GB. If no one has hacked a way to use SD cards in an adapter by the time you read this, you will be spending quite a bit on media. But here's where the cost skyrockets: You will need an AXSM card reader, the AXS-CR1. As of the time of this post, I have not found one for less than $1000. Maybe in your time it will not be as expensive. I'm not getting any younger. If I am still alive in 5 years, I will update this information. You might be reading this 10 years from my time. Then, why are looking at buying an F55?? In my time, it was already a 12 year old camera. In yours, it's 22 years old. Maybe you're a future hipster (look it up -- they existed) and feel nostalgic for 4K and now every phone shoots 24K. If Blackmagic gave you AF, use that instead.
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted September 17, 2024 Premium Member Posted September 17, 2024 2 hours ago, Samuel Berger said: The issue with the F55 shooting RAW, for anyone Googling this years from now, is that it requires the AXS-R1 add-on. Forget that, the codec is basically a dinosaur, good luck getting it to work in anything smoothly. 1
Samuel Berger Posted September 17, 2024 Author Posted September 17, 2024 10 hours ago, Tyler Purcell said: Forget that, the codec is basically a dinosaur, good luck getting it to work in anything smoothly. So, there is zero advantage to shooting RAW with the F55?
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted September 17, 2024 Premium Member Posted September 17, 2024 5 hours ago, Samuel Berger said: So, there is zero advantage to shooting RAW with the F55? Not if you care about using the raw files. You need one heck of a beefy system AND storage for them to playback in real time. The newer X-OCN codec that launched few years ago and has been adopted by the Venice and Burano, is much better.
Giray Izcan Posted September 18, 2024 Posted September 18, 2024 There is a big advantage to using RAW. It's a 16 bit wide gamut color space. Just transcode it to whatever flavor you want for editorial and then conform it back to the RAW files for color timing and mastering in Davinci. You don't need raw files for editorial. I would put the raw files through davinci and would apply a rec 709 lut to have a more pleasing image, edit and then bring the edited material back to davinci for finising. Every editor I know works this way when it comes to handling raw files. I haven't met a single editor who wants or is ok with editing raw files. 2
Samuel Berger Posted September 18, 2024 Author Posted September 18, 2024 1 hour ago, Giray Izcan said: I haven't met a single editor who wants or is ok with editing raw files. Same. I might just use ProRes 4444 or XAVC 480. Netflix suggests XAVC 480, S-Gamut3.cine/Slog3. Here is the suggested method:
Premium Member Aapo Lettinen Posted September 18, 2024 Premium Member Posted September 18, 2024 On 9/17/2024 at 10:45 PM, Tyler Purcell said: Not if you care about using the raw files. You need one heck of a beefy system AND storage for them to playback in real time. The newer X-OCN codec that launched few years ago and has been adopted by the Venice and Burano, is much better. Yes the R7 recorder is much more practical with the F55, saving lots of storage space. those are more expensive recorders of course but worth it if shooting lots of material per day. the original R5 stuff will easily run 1.2 - 2TB per day or more even when shooting very basic stuff with minimum takes
Samuel Berger Posted September 18, 2024 Author Posted September 18, 2024 1 hour ago, Aapo Lettinen said: Yes the R7 recorder is much more practical with the F55, saving lots of storage space. those are more expensive recorders of course but worth it if shooting lots of material per day. the original R5 stuff will easily run 1.2 - 2TB per day or more even when shooting very basic stuff with minimum takes I see it still fetches upwards of $3000 and the AXSM cards are $380. The camera itself was $2000 so it would be silly to splurge on an overpriced add-on. If I want RAW I might be better off buying a Canon R5C. It has 8K RAW and is about the price of the AXS-R7. I think ultimately that for the use I'm giving it, ProRes is more than enough. I do wish @Stuart Brereton came back to the forum so I could ask him about the F55.
Samuel Berger Posted September 21, 2024 Author Posted September 21, 2024 On 9/17/2024 at 3:45 PM, Tyler Purcell said: The newer X-OCN codec that launched few years ago and has been adopted by the Venice and Burano, is much better. I just found out that the F55 can record X-OCN as long as you have the AXS-R7 recorder. Which, again, sells for $3000 used, then requires a $380 card. Unlike the stuff you record onto SxS cards, you can't just plug a USB cable into the camera and offload stuff from AXSM cards. You have to spend $1000 on a card reader. I know the F55 is a beloved camera many people are nostalgic for. But it really seems like I should have saved my money and just bought a FX6, especially with the new firmware that was just announced. Because even though the camera plus viewfinder was $2000, when all is said and done I would need to spend almost $4000 extra to get a proper workflow out of it.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now